Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31645362›Full record

ArticleeNeuro

Chemogenetic Activation of Excitatory Neurons Alters Hippocampal Neurotransmission in a Dose-Dependent Manner.

Sthitapranjya Pati, Sonali S Salvi, Mamata Kallianpur, Bhupesh Vaidya, Antara Banerjee, Sudipta Maiti, James P Clement, Vidita A Vaidya

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eNeuro. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Chemogenetic modulation of CNS pericytes: Impact on pericyte CaMolecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Modulating the Excitability of Olfactory Output Neurons Affects Whole-Body Metabolism.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. CurrentCurrent opinion in biomedical engineering · 2020
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sthitapranjya PatiDepartment of Biological Sciences, Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Mumbai 400005, India.
Sonali S SalviDepartment of Biological Sciences, Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Mumbai 400005, India.
Mamata KallianpurDepartment of Chemical Sciences, Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Mumbai 400005, India.
Bhupesh VaidyaNeuroscience Unit, Jawaharlal Nehru Centre for Advanced Scientific Research, Bangalore 560064, India.ORCID 0000-0003-2003-6695
Antara BanerjeeDepartment of Biological Sciences, Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Mumbai 400005, India.
Sudipta MaitiDepartment of Chemical Sciences, Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Mumbai 400005, India.
James P ClementNeuroscience Unit, Jawaharlal Nehru Centre for Advanced Scientific Research, Bangalore 560064, India clement@jncasr.ac.in vvaidya@tifr.res.in.
Vidita A VaidyaDepartment of Biological Sciences, Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Mumbai 400005, India clement@jncasr.ac.in vvaidya@tifr.res.in.
Tata Institute of Fundamental Research · INJawaharlal Nehru Centre for Advanced Scientific Research · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Designer receptors exclusively activated by designer drugs (DREADD)-based chemogenetic tools are extensively used to manipulate neuronal activity in a cell type-specific manner. Whole-cell patch-clamp recordings indicate membrane depolarization, coupled with increased neuronal firing rate, following administration of the DREADD ligand, clozapine-N-oxide (CNO) to activate the Gq-coupled DREADD, hM3Dq. Although hM3Dq has been used to enhance neuronal firing in order to manipulate diverse behaviors, often within 30 min to 1 h after CNO administration, the physiological effects on excitatory neurotransmission remain poorly understood. We investigated the influence of CNO-mediated hM3Dq DREADD activation on distinct aspects of hippocampal excitatory neurotransmission at the Schaffer collateral-CA1 synapse in hippocampal slices derived from mice expressing hM3Dq in Ca

Indexed as

AnimalsCells, CulturedDesigner DrugsDose-Response Relationship, DrugExcitatory Postsynaptic PotentialsHippocampusLong-Term PotentiationMiceMice, TransgenicNeuronsPatch-Clamp TechniquesSynaptic TransmissionDesigner DrugsCA1chemogeneticCNODREADDshM3Dqpharmacogenetic

Identifiers

PMID31645362
PMCPMC6860986
OpenAlexW2981557132

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.