ArticleCold Spring Harbor molecular case studies2019
Data sharing for clinical utility.
Article in Cold Spring Harbor molecular case studies, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparative analysis of RNA expression in a single institution cohort of pediatric cancer patients.NPJ precision oncology · 2025Article
- Whole genome and transcriptome integrated analyses guide clinical care of pediatric poor prognosis cancers.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Targeting TRIP13 in favorable histology Wilms tumor with nuclear export inhibitors synergizes with doxorubicin.Communications biology · 2024Article
- Using big data in pediatric oncology: Current applications and future directions.Seminars in oncology · 2020Review
- Sustainable Community-Wide Model to Enhance Cancer Data Usage and Utility.JCO clinical cancer informaticsArticle
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Genomic data offer valuable insights that can be used to help find treatments and cures for disease. Precision medicine, defined by the NIH as "an emerging approach for disease treatment and prevention that takes into account individual variability in genes, environment, and lifestyle for each person," is gaining acceptance among physicians, who are beginning to integrate patient-centric data analysis into clinical decision-making. Although precision medicine makes use of various types of data, this piece focuses on molecular characterization data specifically, as the discoveries yielded from these data can advance thinking around clinical care for cancer patients. Our pediatrics genomics team at the University of California Santa Cruz Genomics Institute is uniquely situated to discuss the use of shared genomic data for clinical benefit because our collaborations with hospital partners in the United States and internationally rely on big-data comparative genomic analysis. Using shared data, Treehouse Childhood Cancer Initiative develops methods for comparative analysis of tumor RNA sequencing profiles from single patients for the purposes of identifying overexpressed oncogenes that could be targeted by therapies in the clinic. To enable and improve this analysis, we continuously increase the size of our data compendium by adding public pediatric tumor RNA sequencing data sets. We developed an approach for assessing the quality of shared RNA sequencing data to ensure the integrity of the data. In this approach we calculate the number of mapped exonic nonduplicate (MEND) reads, applying a 10 million MEND read minimum threshold for inclusion in our comparative analysis. In collaboration with Stanford University and Lucile Packard Children's Hospital Stanford, our team at Treehouse Childhood Cancer Initiative explores the value to researchers everywhere of shared genomic data for clinical utility and the challenges of data sharing that threaten to impede otherwise rapid advances in precision medicine. This Perspective offers recommendations for maximizing the use of genomic data to make discoveries that will benefit patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.