Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31645349›Full record

ArticleCold Spring Harbor molecular case studies2019

Data sharing for clinical utility.

Isabel Bjork, Jennifer Peralez, David Haussler, Sheri L Spunt, Olena Morozova Vaske

Erratum issuedOpen access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cold Spring Harbor molecular case studies, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Isabel BjorkUniversity of California Santa Cruz Genomics Institute, Santa Cruz, California 95064, USA.
Jennifer PeralezStanford University School of Medicine and Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford, California 94305, USA.
David HausslerUniversity of California Santa Cruz Genomics Institute, Santa Cruz, California 95064, USA.
Sheri L SpuntStanford University School of Medicine and Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford, California 94305, USA.
Olena Morozova VaskeUniversity of California Santa Cruz Genomics Institute, Santa Cruz, California 95064, USA.
Stanford Cancer InstituteUniversity of California, Santa Cruz · USHoward Hughes Medical Institute · US

Funding

Howard Hughes Medical Institute
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genomic data offer valuable insights that can be used to help find treatments and cures for disease. Precision medicine, defined by the NIH as "an emerging approach for disease treatment and prevention that takes into account individual variability in genes, environment, and lifestyle for each person," is gaining acceptance among physicians, who are beginning to integrate patient-centric data analysis into clinical decision-making. Although precision medicine makes use of various types of data, this piece focuses on molecular characterization data specifically, as the discoveries yielded from these data can advance thinking around clinical care for cancer patients. Our pediatrics genomics team at the University of California Santa Cruz Genomics Institute is uniquely situated to discuss the use of shared genomic data for clinical benefit because our collaborations with hospital partners in the United States and internationally rely on big-data comparative genomic analysis. Using shared data, Treehouse Childhood Cancer Initiative develops methods for comparative analysis of tumor RNA sequencing profiles from single patients for the purposes of identifying overexpressed oncogenes that could be targeted by therapies in the clinic. To enable and improve this analysis, we continuously increase the size of our data compendium by adding public pediatric tumor RNA sequencing data sets. We developed an approach for assessing the quality of shared RNA sequencing data to ensure the integrity of the data. In this approach we calculate the number of mapped exonic nonduplicate (MEND) reads, applying a 10 million MEND read minimum threshold for inclusion in our comparative analysis. In collaboration with Stanford University and Lucile Packard Children's Hospital Stanford, our team at Treehouse Childhood Cancer Initiative explores the value to researchers everywhere of shared genomic data for clinical utility and the challenges of data sharing that threaten to impede otherwise rapid advances in precision medicine. This Perspective offers recommendations for maximizing the use of genomic data to make discoveries that will benefit patients.

Indexed as

Big DataClinical Decision-MakingGenomeGenomicsHumansInformation DisseminationNeoplasmsPrecision MedicineSequence Analysis, RNA

Identifiers

PMID31645349
PMCPMC6824251
OpenAlexW2981874863

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.