Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31645200›Full record

ArticleThe Clinical neuropsychologist2020

Validity of early-onset dementia diagnoses in VA electronic medical record administrative data.

Janice C Marceaux, Jason R Soble, Justin J F O'Rourke, Alicia A Swan, Margaret Wells, Megan Amuan, Hari Krishna Raju Sagiraju, Blessen C Eapen, Mary Jo Pugh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Clinical neuropsychologist, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Janice C MarceauxPsychology Service, South Texas Veterans Health Care System San Antonio, TX, USA.
Jason R SoblePsychology Service, South Texas Veterans Health Care System San Antonio, TX, USA.
Justin J F O'RourkePsychology Service, South Texas Veterans Health Care System San Antonio, TX, USA.
Alicia A SwanDepartment of Psychology, University of Texas at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA.
Margaret WellsPolytrauma Rehabilitation Center, South Texas Veterans Health Care System, San Antonio, TX, USA.
Megan AmuanVA Salt Lake City Health Care System, Informatics, Decision-Enhancement and Analytic Sciences Center, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Hari Krishna Raju SagirajuDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Epidemiology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Blessen C EapenPolytrauma Rehabilitation Center, South Texas Veterans Health Care System, San Antonio, TX, USA.
Mary Jo PughVA Salt Lake City Health Care System, Informatics, Decision-Enhancement and Analytic Sciences Center, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.

Funding

Home Excellence Research and Outcomes Center to Advance, Redefine and Evaluate Non-institutional Caregiving (HERO CARE)I50HX002767 · VA · SOUTH TEXAS VETERANS HEALTH CARE SYSTEM · PI LUCI LEYKUM · 2019 to 2026
–
RRD VA I21 RX002060
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo determine the validity of diagnoses indicative of early-onset dementia (EOD) obtained from an algorithm using administrative data, we examined Veterans Health Administration (VHA) electronic medical records (EMRs).

methodA previously used method of identifying cases of dementia using administrative data was applied to a random sample of 176 cases of Post-9/11 deployed veterans under 65 years of age. Retrospective, cross-sectional examination of EMRs was conducted, using a combination of administrative data, chart abstraction, and review/consensus by board-certified neuropsychologists.

resultsApproximately 73% of EOD diagnoses identified using existing algorithms were identified as false positives in the overall sample. This increased to approximately 76% among those with mental health conditions and approximately 85% among those with mild traumatic brain injury (TBI; i.e. concussion). Factors related to improved diagnostic accuracy included more severe TBI, diagnosing clinician type, presence of neuroimaging data, absence of a comorbid mental health condition diagnosis, and older age at time of diagnosis.

conclusionsA previously used algorithm for detecting dementia using VHA administrative data was not supported for use in the younger adult samples and resulted in an unacceptably high number of false positives. Based on these findings, there is concern for possible misclassification in population studies using similar algorithms to identify rates of EOD among veterans. Further, we provide suggestions to develop an enhanced algorithm for more accurate dementia surveillance among younger populations.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsCross-Sectional StudiesDementiaEarly DiagnosisElectronic Health RecordsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeuropsychological TestsRetrospective StudiesVeteransDementiaepidemiologyhealth administrative dataTBIveterans

Identifiers

PMID31645200
PMCPMC13157277

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.