Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31644916›Full record

ArticleCell reports2019

Combinatorial Pharyngeal Taste Coding for Feeding Avoidance in Adult Drosophila.

Yu-Chieh David Chen, Scarlet Jinhong Park, Ryan Matthew Joseph, William W Ja, Anupama Arun Dahanukar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Connectomic mapping of pharyngeal and gut sensory circuits in adultbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Bitter Sensing ProtectsThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Meeting a threat of the Anthropocene: Taste avoidance of metal ions byProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yu-Chieh David ChenInterdepartmental Neuroscience Program, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521, USA.
Scarlet Jinhong ParkDepartment of Neuroscience, The Scripps Research Institute, Jupiter, FL 33458, USA; Skaggs Graduate School, The Scripps Research Institute, Jupiter, FL 33458, USA.
Ryan Matthew JosephDepartment of Molecular, Cell and Systems Biology, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521, USA.
William W JaDepartment of Neuroscience, The Scripps Research Institute, Jupiter, FL 33458, USA; Skaggs Graduate School, The Scripps Research Institute, Jupiter, FL 33458, USA.
Anupama Arun DahanukarInterdepartmental Neuroscience Program, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521, USA; Department of Molecular, Cell and Systems Biology, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521, USA. Electronic address: anupama.dahanukar@ucr.edu.

Funding

Resource Component: Acquisition, maintenance and distribution of Drosophila stocksP40OD018537 · OD · TRUSTEES OF INDIANA UNIVERSITY · PI Annette L. Parks · 2014 to 2026
$13.5M
Nutritional and Epigenetic Priming of Metabolism and Aging in DrosophilaR01AG045036 · NIA · SCRIPPS FLORIDA · PI JA, WILLIAM W · 2014 to 2018
$2.0M
Functional analysis of insect taste receptorsR01DC013587 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA RIVERSIDE · PI DAHANUKAR, ANUPAMA ARUN · 2014 to 2018
$1.8M
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNIA NIH HHS R01 AG045036NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC013587NIH HHS P40 OD018537
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Taste drives appropriate food preference and intake. In Drosophila, taste neurons are housed in both external and internal organs, but the latter have been relatively underexplored. Here, we report that Poxn mutants with a minimal taste system of pharyngeal neurons can avoid many aversive tastants, including bitter compounds, acid, and salt, suggesting that pharyngeal taste is sufficient for rejecting intake of aversive compounds. Optogenetic activation of selected pharyngeal bitter neurons during feeding events elicits changes in feeding parameters that can suppress intake. Functional dissection experiments indicate that multiple classes of pharyngeal neurons are involved in achieving behavioral avoidance, by virtue of being inhibited or activated by aversive tastants. Tracing second-order pharyngeal circuits reveals two main relay centers for processing pharyngeal taste inputs. Together, our results suggest that the pharynx can control the ingestion of harmful compounds by integrating taste input from different classes of pharyngeal neurons.

Indexed as

Avoidance LearningTasteAnimalsAversive AgentsChemoreceptor CellsDrosophila melanogasterDrosophila ProteinsFood PreferencesNerve Tissue ProteinsPaired Box Transcription FactorsPharynxTaste PerceptionAversive AgentsDrosophila ProteinsNerve Tissue ProteinsPaired Box Transcription FactorsPoxn protein, Drosophilaaversive compoundsDrosophilafeeding avoidancegustationpharynxtastetrans-Tango mapping

Identifiers

PMID31644916
PMCPMC6860367

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.