Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31644798›Full record

ArticleHealth policy and planning2019

Financial protection and equity of access to health services with the free maternal and child health initiative in Lao PDR.

Somil Nagpal, Emiko Masaki, Eko Setyo Pambudi, Bart Jacobs

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health policy and planning, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Examining the implementation of the Linda Mama free maternity program in Kenya.The International journal of health planning and management · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Somil NagpalThe World Bank, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.
Emiko MasakiThe World Bank, Vientiane, Lao PDR.
Eko Setyo PambudiThe World Bank, Jakarta, Indonesia.
Bart JacobsDeutsche Gesellschaft fur Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.
Bank Indonesia · IDDeutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit · PHWorld Bank · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Though Lao People's Democratic Republic (Lao PDR) has made considerable progress in improving maternal and child health (MCH), significant disparities exist nationwide, with the poor and geographically isolated ethnic groups having limited access to services. In its pursuit of universal health coverage, the government introduced a Free MCH initiative in 2011, which has recently been subsumed within the new National Health Insurance (NHI) programme. Although this was a major national health financing reform, there have been few evaluations of the extent to which it improved equitable access to MCH services. We analyse surveys that provide information on demand-side and supply-side factors influencing access and utilization of free MCH services, especially for vulnerable groups. This includes two rounds of household surveys (2010 and 2013) in southern Lao PDR involving, respectively 2766 and 2911 women who delivered within 24 months prior to each survey. These data have been analysed according to the socio-economic status, geographic location and ethnicity of women using the MCH services as well as any associated out-of-pocket expenses and structural quality of these services. Two other surveys analysed here focused on human resources for health and structural quality of health facilities. Together, these data point to persistent large inequities in access and financial protection that need to be addressed. Significant differences were found in the utilization of health services by both economic status and ethnicity. Relatively large costs for institutional births were incurred by the poor and did not decline between 2010 and 2013 whereby there was no significant impact on financial protection. The overall benefit incidence of the universal programme was not pro-poor. The inequity was accentuated by issues related to distribution and nature of human resources, supply-side readiness and thus quality of care provided across different geographical areas.

Indexed as

FemaleHealthcare DisparitiesHealth Care ReformHealth ExpendituresHealth Services AccessibilityHumansLaosMaleMaternal-Child Health ServicesSocioeconomic FactorsSurveys and QuestionnairesUniversal Health Insuranceequityethnic minoritiesfinancial protectionfree maternal and child healthnon-financial barrierspro-poorsupply-side readinessUniversal health coverage

Identifiers

PMID31644798
PMCPMC6807510
OpenAlexW2982530864

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.