Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31644672›Full record

ArticleArquivos brasileiros de cirurgia digestiva : ABCD = Brazilian archives of digestive surgery2019

ROUTINE USE OF V-LOCK® SUTURE FOR BARIATRIC ANASTOMOSIS IS SAFE: COMPARATIVE RESULTS FROM CONSECUTIVE CASE SERIES.

Claudia Bures, Philippa Seika, Christian Denecke, Johann Pratschke, Ricardo Zorron

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Arquivos brasileiros de cirurgia digestiva : ABCD = Brazilian archives of digestive surgery, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. AUXILIARY THREAD TO TIE A SHORT THREAD OF A RUNNING SUTURE.Arquivos brasileiros de cirurgia digestiva : ABCD = Brazilian archives of digestive surgery
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Claudia BuresCenter for Bariatric and Metabolic Surgery, Center of Innovative Surgery (ZIC), Department of Surgery, Campus Virchow Klinikum and Campus Mitte, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Philippa SeikaCenter for Bariatric and Metabolic Surgery, Center of Innovative Surgery (ZIC), Department of Surgery, Campus Virchow Klinikum and Campus Mitte, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Christian DeneckeCenter for Bariatric and Metabolic Surgery, Center of Innovative Surgery (ZIC), Department of Surgery, Campus Virchow Klinikum and Campus Mitte, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Johann PratschkeCenter for Bariatric and Metabolic Surgery, Center of Innovative Surgery (ZIC), Department of Surgery, Campus Virchow Klinikum and Campus Mitte, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Ricardo ZorronCenter for Bariatric and Metabolic Surgery, Klinikum Ernst von Bergmann Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5438-9627

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn high-income countries, morbid obesity is a growing health problem that has already reached epidemic proportions. When performing a laparoscopic gastric bypass several operative methods exist.

aimTo describe the institutional experience using a knotless unidirectional barbed suture (V-Loc 180/Covidien, Mansfield, MA) to create a hand-sewn gastrojejunostomy (GJ) and jejunojejunostomy (JJ) during bariatric surgery.

methodsEvaluation of a case series of 87 morbidly obese patients who underwent laparoscopic gastric bypass with a hand-sewn gastrojejunostomy (GJA) and jejunojejunostomy (JJA) between 01/2015 and 06/2017. The patients were divided into two groups: in group I, GJA und JJA sutures were performed using the knotless unidirectional barbed suture; in group II, GJA and JJA were sutured with resorbable multifilament thread (Vicryl® 3/0 Ethicon, Livingstone, UK). The recorded data on gender, age, BMI, ASA score, operative time, postoperative morbidity, length of hospital stay, and reoperation, were analyzed and compared.

resultsAll procedures were completed laparoscopically with no mortality. The mean operative time was 123.23 (±30.631) in group I and 127.57 (±42.772) in group II (p<0.05). The postoperative complications did not differ significantly between the two groups. Early complications were observed for two patients (0.9%) in the barbed suture group and for one patient (0.42%) in the multifilament suture group (p<0.05). In group I two patients (0.9%) required reoperation: on the basis of jejunojejunal stenosis in one patient, and local abscess near the gastrojejunostomy, without a leakage, in the other. In group II one patient (0.42%) required reoperation due to stenosis of the GJA. The duration of hospital admission was similar for both groups: 3.36 (±0.743) days in group I vs. 3.38 (±1.058) days in group II (p<0.05).

conclusionThe novel anastomotic technique is a safe and effective method and can be applied to gastrojejunal anastomosis and jejunojejunal anastomosis in laparoscopic gastric bypass.

Indexed as

AdultAnastomosis, SurgicalBariatric SurgeryEquipment SafetyFemaleGastric BypassHumansJejunostomyJejunumLength of StayMaleMiddle AgedObesity, MorbidOperative TimePolyglactin 910Postoperative ComplicationsPolyglactin 910

Identifiers

PMID31644672
PMCPMC6812141

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.