Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31644671›Full record

ArticleArquivos brasileiros de cirurgia digestiva : ABCD = Brazilian archives of digestive surgery2019

EFFECT OF COPAIBA OIL IN INTESTINAL MUCOSA OF RATS SUBMITTED TO HYPOVOLEMIC SHOCK.

Renan Kleber Costa Teixeira, Felipe Lobato da Silva Costa, Faustino Chaves Calvo, Deivid Ramos Dos Santos, Edson Yuzur Yasojima, Marcus Vinicius Henriques Brito

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Arquivos brasileiros de cirurgia digestiva : ABCD = Brazilian archives of digestive surgery, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Renan Kleber Costa TeixeiraLaboratory of Experimental Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, State University of Pará, Belém, PA, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5079-297X
Felipe Lobato da Silva CostaLaboratory of Experimental Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, State University of Pará, Belém, PA, Brazil.
Faustino Chaves CalvoLaboratory of Experimental Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, State University of Pará, Belém, PA, Brazil.
Deivid Ramos Dos SantosLaboratory of Experimental Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, State University of Pará, Belém, PA, Brazil.
Edson Yuzur YasojimaLaboratory of Experimental Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, State University of Pará, Belém, PA, Brazil.
Marcus Vinicius Henriques BritoLaboratory of Experimental Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, State University of Pará, Belém, PA, Brazil.
Universidade do Estado do Pará · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHypovolemic shock is a common disease in polytrauma patients and may develop ischemia in various organs, increasing morbidity and mortality. The bowel is usually most affected by this condition.

aimTo evaluate the effects of copaiba oil on the intestinal mucosa's injury of rats submitted to hypovolemic shock.

methodFifteen rats were divided into three groups: sham - simulated surgery; ischemia - animals submitted to hypovolemic shock; and copaiba - animals submitted to hypovolemic shock previously treated with copaiba oil. Mean blood pressure, arterial blood gas after shock induction, degree of intestinal lesion and villus length were evaluated.

resultsThe sham presented the lowest values of lactate and PaCO2 and the highest values of mean arterial pressure, pH and bicarbonate in relation to the other groups. The degree of mesenteric lesion was zero in the sham group; 3.00±1.00 in the ischemia group; and 3.00±0.71 in the copaiba group. The villus length was 173.60±8.42 in the sham, 142.77±8.33 in the ischemia and 143.01±9.57 in the copaiba group. There was a significant difference between the sham and the other groups (p<0.05); however, there not significant difference between groups Ischemia and copaiba.

conclusionAdministration of copaiba oil did not reduce the intestinal mucosa lesion of rats after hypovolemic shock.

Indexed as

ShockAnimalsAnti-Inflammatory AgentsDisease Models, AnimalFabaceaeIleumIntestinal MucosaIschemiaMalePlant OilsRandom AllocationRats, WistarAnti-Inflammatory AgentsPlant Oils

Identifiers

PMID31644671
PMCPMC6812147
OpenAlexW2980410566

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.