Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31644602›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

Escherichia coli and Salmonella spp. isolated from Australian meat chickens remain susceptible to critically important antimicrobial agents.

Sam Abraham, Mark O'Dea, Shafi Sahibzada, Kylie Hewson, Anthony Pavic, Tania Veltman, Rebecca Abraham, Taha Harris, Darren J Trott, David Jordan

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Genomic diversity ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Comparison of Antimicrobial Resistance among CommensalAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Phenotypic and Genotypic Analysis of Antimicrobial Resistance inAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Molecular Epidemiology ofInternational journal of microbiology · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Non-TyphoidalAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Sam AbrahamAntimicrobial Resistance and Infectious Disease Laboratory, Murdoch University, Murdoch, Western Australia, Australia.
Mark O'DeaAntimicrobial Resistance and Infectious Disease Laboratory, Murdoch University, Murdoch, Western Australia, Australia.
Shafi SahibzadaAntimicrobial Resistance and Infectious Disease Laboratory, Murdoch University, Murdoch, Western Australia, Australia.
Kylie HewsonAustralian Chicken Meat Federation, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Anthony PavicBirling Avian Laboratories, Bringelly, New South Wales, Australia.
Tania VeltmanAustralian Centre for Antimicrobial Resistance Ecology, School of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Roseworthy, South Australia, Australia.
Rebecca AbrahamAntimicrobial Resistance and Infectious Disease Laboratory, Murdoch University, Murdoch, Western Australia, Australia.
Taha HarrisBirling Avian Laboratories, Bringelly, New South Wales, Australia.
Darren J TrottAustralian Centre for Antimicrobial Resistance Ecology, School of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Roseworthy, South Australia, Australia.
David JordanNew South Wales Department of Primary Industries, Wollongbar, New South Wales, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The World Health Organisation has defined "highest priority critically important antimicrobials" (CIAs) as those requiring the greatest control during food production. Evidence demonstrating that restricted antimicrobial usage prevents the emergence of resistance to CIA's amongst pathogenic and commensal organisms on a production system-wide scale would strengthen international efforts to control antimicrobial resistance (AMR). Therefore, in a designed survey of all major chicken-meat producers in Australia, we investigated the phenotypic AMR of E. coli (n = 206) and Salmonella (n = 53) from caecal samples of chickens at slaughter (n = 200). A large proportion of E. coli isolates (63.1%) were susceptible to all tested antimicrobials. With regards to CIA resistance, only two E.coli isolates demonstrated resistance to fluoroquinolones, attributed to mutations in the quinolone resistance-determining regions of gyrA. Antimicrobial resistance was observed for trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (8.7%), streptomycin (9.7%), ampicillin (14.1%), tetracycline (19.4%) and cefoxitin (0.5%). All Salmonella isolates were susceptible to ceftiofur, chloramphenicol, ciprofloxacin, colistin, florfenicol, gentamicin and tetracycline. A low frequency of Salmonella isolates exhibited resistance to streptomycin (1.9%), ampicillin (3.8%), and cefoxitin (11.3%). AMR was only observed among Salmonella Sofia serovars. None of the Salmonella isolates exhibited a multi-class-resistant phenotype. Whole genome sequencing did not identify any known resistance mechanisms for the Salmonella isolates demonstrating resistance to cefoxitin. The results provide strong evidence that resistance to highest priority CIA's is absent in commensal E. coli and Salmonella isolated from Australian meat chickens, and demonstrates low levels of resistance to compounds with less critical ratings such as cefoxitin, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, and tetracycline. Apart from regulated exclusion of CIAs from most aspects of livestock production, vaccination against key bacterial pathogens and stringent biosecurity are likely to have contributed to the favorable AMR status of the Australian chicken meat industry. Nevertheless, industry and government need to proactively monitor AMR and antimicrobial stewardship practices to ensure the long-term protection of both animal and human health.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsAustraliaChickensDrug Resistance, BacterialEscherichia coliFood MicrobiologyMeatSalmonellaWhole Genome SequencingAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID31644602
PMCPMC6808415

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.