Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31644561›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

The French adaptation and validation of the Partners in Health (PIH) scale among patients with chronic conditions seen in primary care.

Émilie Hudon, Maud-Christine Chouinard, Cynthia Krieg, Mireille Lambert, Heithem Joober, Sharon Lawn, David Smith, Sylvie Lambert, Catherine Hudon

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06782126 (Self-management Support After Burns), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06782126 active not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Self-management Support After Burns: Study Protocol for a Multicenter Stepped-wedge Hybrid Type 2 Effectiveness-implementation Study

TypeobservationalSponsorMartini Hospital GroningenRan2024 to 2026Enrolled146ConditionsBurnsArmsBreeZe (Brandwonden en Zelfmanagement)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Reconciling validity and challenges of patient comfort and understanding: Guidelines to patient-oriented questionnaires.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Émilie HudonFaculté de Médecine et des Sciences de la Santé, Université de Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-0735-5528
Maud-Christine ChouinardCentre intégré universitaire de Santé et de Services sociaux du Saguenay-Lac-Saint-Jean, Chicoutimi, Québec, Canada.
Cynthia KriegFaculté de Médecine et des Sciences de la Santé, Université de Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada.
Mireille LambertCentre intégré universitaire de Santé et de Services sociaux du Saguenay-Lac-Saint-Jean, Chicoutimi, Québec, Canada.
Heithem JooberFaculté de Médecine et des Sciences de la Santé, Université de Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada.
Sharon LawnFlinders Human Behaviour & Health Research Unit (FHBHRU), Flinders University College of Medicine and Public Health, Bedford Park, South Australia, Adelaide, Australia.
David SmithFlinders Human Behaviour & Health Research Unit (FHBHRU), Flinders University College of Medicine and Public Health, Bedford Park, South Australia, Adelaide, Australia.
Sylvie LambertÉcole des sciences infirmières, Université McGill, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Catherine HudonFaculté de Médecine et des Sciences de la Santé, Université de Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada.
Université de Sherbrooke · CAFlinders University · AUCentre Intégré Universitaire de Santé et de Services Sociaux du Saguenay–Lac-Saint-Jean · CAMcGill University · CAUniversité du Québec à Chicoutimi · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveMeasuring self-management helps identify the degree of participation of people in the management of their chronic conditions and guides clinicians in determining person-centred priorities for providing support. The Partners in Health scale, a self-report generic questionnaire, was developed to capture the self-management of patients with chronic conditions. This study aimed to translate the Partners in Health scale into French and to examine its psychometric properties in French-speaking people with chronic conditions followed in primary care.

methodsThe Partners in Health scale was translated into French using Hawkins and Osborne's method (2012). Content validity was evaluated through cognitive interviews (Think Aloud Method). Internal consistency was measured at baseline with Cronbach's alpha. Test-retest reliability was evaluated at baseline and two weeks later using the intraclass correlation coefficient. Concurrent validity was measured at baseline with the Self-efficacy for Managing Chronic Disease (SEM-CD) and the Patient Activation Measure (PAM), using Spearman correlations.

resultsCognitive interviews were conducted with 10 participants. During these interviews, most items were clearly understood and accepted as formulated; only a few terms were modified. To evaluate the psychometric properties of the French-language version of the Partners in Health scale, 168 participants (male = 34.5%; mean age = 58 years; mean number of chronic conditions = 4.1) completed the questionnaire at baseline and 47 of them completed the questionnaire two weeks later by telephone. Cronbach's alpha for internal consistency was 0.85 (95% confidence interval: 0.81-0.88). The intraclass correlation coefficient for test-retest reliability was 0.77 (95% confidence interval: 0.58-0.87). Concurrent validity with spearman's coefficient correlation of Self-efficacy for Managing Chronic Disease and Patient Activation Measure was 0.68 and 0.61 respectively.

conclusionThe French-language version of the Partners in Health scale is a reliable and valid questionnaire for the measure of self-management in persons with chronic conditions seen in primary care.

Indexed as

LanguagePsychometricsSelf EfficacyTranslationsChronic DiseaseFemaleFranceHumansInterprofessional RelationsMaleMiddle AgedPrimary Health CareSelf ReportSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID31644561
PMCPMC6808494
OpenAlexW2981401408

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.