Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31644556›Full record

ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2019

Cost-effectiveness and social outcomes of a community-based treatment for podoconiosis lymphoedema in the East Gojjam zone, Ethiopia.

Natalia Hounsome, Meseret Molla Kassahun, Moses Ngari, James A Berkley, Esther Kivaya, Patricia Njuguna, Greg Fegan, Abreham Tamiru, Abebe Kelemework, Tsige Amberbir and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. The health and economic burden of podoconiosis in Ethiopia.Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Natalia HounsomeBrighton and Sussex Centre for Global Health Research, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, University of Sussex, Brighton, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-4460-2495
Meseret Molla KassahunDepartment of RH and Health Services, School of Public Health, College of Health Sciences, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Moses NgariKEMRI/Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Kilifi, Kenya.ORCID 0000-0001-7149-5491
James A BerkleyKEMRI/Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Kilifi, Kenya.
Esther KivayaKEMRI/Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Kilifi, Kenya.
Patricia NjugunaKEMRI/Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Kilifi, Kenya.
Greg FeganKEMRI/Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Kilifi, Kenya.ORCID 0000-0002-2663-2765
Abreham TamiruInternational Orthodox Christian Charities Podoconiosis Project, Debre Markos, Ethiopia.
Abebe KelemeworkInternational Orthodox Christian Charities Podoconiosis Project, Debre Markos, Ethiopia.
Tsige AmberbirInternational Orthodox Christian Charities Podoconiosis Project, Debre Markos, Ethiopia.
Annabelle ClarkeBrighton and Sussex Centre for Global Health Research, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, University of Sussex, Brighton, United Kingdom.
Trudie LangKEMRI/Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Kilifi, Kenya.
Melanie J NewportBrighton and Sussex Centre for Global Health Research, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, University of Sussex, Brighton, United Kingdom.
Andy McKayDepartment of Economics, University of Sussex, Brighton, United Kingdom.
Fikre EnquoselassieSchool of Public Health, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Gail DaveyBrighton and Sussex Centre for Global Health Research, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, University of Sussex, Brighton, United Kingdom.
Kenya Medical Research Institute · KEBrighton and Sussex Medical School · GBAddis Ababa University · ETUniversity of Sussex · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/K007211/1Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPodoconiosis is a disease of the lymphatic vessels of the lower extremities that is caused by chronic exposure to irritant soils. It results in leg swelling, commonly complicated by acute dermatolymphangioadenitis (ADLA), characterised by severe pain, fever and disability.

methodsWe conducted cost-effectiveness and social outcome analyses of a pragmatic, randomised controlled trial of a hygiene and foot-care intervention for people with podoconiosis in the East Gojjam zone of northern Ethiopia. Participants were allocated to the immediate intervention group or the delayed intervention group (control). The 12-month intervention included training in foot hygiene, skin care, bandaging, exercises, and use of socks and shoes, and was supported by lay community assistants. The cost-effectiveness analysis was conducted using the cost of productivity loss due to acute dermatolymphangioadenitis. Household costs were not included. Health outcomes in the cost-effectiveness analysis were: the incidence of ADLA episodes, health-related quality of life captured using the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), and disability scores measured using the WHO Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0).

resultsThe cost of the foot hygiene and lymphoedema management supplies was 529 ETB (69 I$, international dollars) per person per year. The cost of delivery of the intervention as part of the trial, including transportation, storage, training of lay community assistants and administering the intervention was 1,890 ETB (246 I$) per person. The intervention was effective in reducing the incidence of acute dermatolymphangioadenitis episodes and improving DLQI scores, while there were no significant improvements in the disability scores measured using WHODAS 2.0. In 75% of estimations, the intervention was less costly than the control. This was due to improved work productivity. Subgroup analyses based on income group showed that the intervention was cost-effective (both less costly and more effective) in reducing the number of acute dermatolymphangioadenitis episodes and improving health-related quality of life in families with monthly income <1,000 ETB (130 I$). For the subgroup with family income ≥1,000 ETB, the intervention was more effective but more costly than the control.

conclusionsWhilst there is evident benefit of the intervention for all, the economic impact would be greatest for the poorest.

Indexed as

Cost-Benefit AnalysisElephantiasisEthiopiaFemaleHumansHygieneLymphedemaMaleQuality of LifeTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID31644556
PMCPMC6808421
OpenAlexW2981056959

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.