Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31644534›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

Does self-reported pregnancy loss identify women at risk of an adverse cardiovascular phenotype in later life? Insights from UK Biobank.

Einas Elmahi, Mihir M Sanghvi, Alexander Jones, Christina Y L Aye, Adam J Lewandowski, Nay Aung, Jackie A Cooper, José Miguel Paiva, Elena Lukaschuk, Stefan K Piechnik and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Einas ElmahiOxford Cardiovascular Clinical Research Facility, Radcliffe Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Radcliffe Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, John Radcliffe, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-7707-9456
Mihir M SanghviWilliam Harvey Research Institute, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre at Barts, Queen Mary University of London, Charterhouse Square, London, Unite Kingdom, Barts Heart Centre, St Bartholomew's Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, West Smithfield, London, United Kingdom.
Alexander JonesDepartment of Paediatrics, Children's Hospital, John Radcliffe, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Christina Y L AyeOxford Cardiovascular Clinical Research Facility, Radcliffe Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Radcliffe Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, John Radcliffe, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Adam J LewandowskiOxford Cardiovascular Clinical Research Facility, Radcliffe Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Radcliffe Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, John Radcliffe, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Nay AungOxford Cardiovascular Clinical Research Facility, Radcliffe Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Radcliffe Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, John Radcliffe, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Jackie A CooperOxford Cardiovascular Clinical Research Facility, Radcliffe Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Radcliffe Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, John Radcliffe, Oxford, United Kingdom.
José Miguel PaivaOxford Cardiovascular Clinical Research Facility, Radcliffe Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Radcliffe Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, John Radcliffe, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Elena LukaschukOxford Centre for Clinical Magnetic Resonance Research, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Radcliffe Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Stefan K PiechnikOxford Centre for Clinical Magnetic Resonance Research, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Radcliffe Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Stefan NeubauerOxford Centre for Clinical Magnetic Resonance Research, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Radcliffe Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Steffen E PetersenWilliam Harvey Research Institute, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre at Barts, Queen Mary University of London, Charterhouse Square, London, Unite Kingdom, Barts Heart Centre, St Bartholomew's Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, West Smithfield, London, United Kingdom.
Paul LeesonOxford Cardiovascular Clinical Research Facility, Radcliffe Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Radcliffe Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, John Radcliffe, Oxford, United Kingdom.
John Radcliffe Hospital · GBSt Bartholomew's Hospital · GB

Funding

British Heart Foundation FS/11/65/28865British Heart Foundation FS/18/22/33479British Heart Foundation FS/18/3/33292British Heart Foundation FS/19/7/34148British Heart Foundation PG/14/89/31194Department of HealthMedical Research Council MC_PC_17228Medical Research Council MC_QA137853Medical Research Council MR/L016311/1Wellcome Trust 203553/Z/16/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionCardiovascular disease (CVD) is more common in women who have had pregnancy complications such as spontaneous pregnancy loss. We used cross-sectional data from the UK Biobank Imaging Enhancement Study to determine whether pregnancy loss is associated with cardiac or vascular remodelling in later life, which might contribute to this increased risk.

methodsPregnancy history was reported by women participating in UK Biobank between 2006 and 2010 at age 40-69 years using a self-completed touch-screen questionnaire. Associations between self-reported spontaneous pregnancy loss and cardiovascular measures, collected in women who participated in the Imaging Enhancement Study up to the end of 2015, were examined. Cardiac structure and function were assessed by magnetic resonance (CMR) steady-state free precession imaging at 1.5 Tesla. Carotid intima-media thickness (CIMT) measurements were taken for both common carotid arteries using a CardioHealth Station. Statistical associations with CMR and carotid measures were adjusted for age, BMI and other cardiovascular risk factors.

resultsData were available on 2660 women of whom 111 were excluded because of pre-existing cardiovascular disease and 30 had no pregnancy information available. Of the remaining 2519, 446 were nulligravid and 2073 had a history of pregnancies, of whom 622 reported at least one pregnancy loss (92% miscarriages and 8% stillbirths) and 1451 reported no pregnancy loss. No significant differences in any cardiac or carotid parameters were evident in women who reported pregnancy loss compared to other groups (Table 1).

conclusionWomen who self-report pregnancy loss do not have significant differences in cardiac structure, cardiac function, or carotid structure in later life to explain their increased cardiovascular risk. This suggests any cardiovascular risks associated with pregnancy loss operate through other disease mechanisms. Alternatively, other characteristics of pregnancy loss, which we were not able to take account of, such as timing and number of pregnancy losses may be required to identify those at greatest cardiovascular risk.

Indexed as

Biological Specimen BanksSelf ReportAbortion, SpontaneousAdultAgedCardiovascular DiseasesCarotid Intima-Media ThicknessConfounding Factors, EpidemiologicFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMiddle AgedPregnancyRisk FactorsUnited Kingdom

Identifiers

PMID31644534
PMCPMC6808447
OpenAlexW2981777837

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.