Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31644488›Full record

ArticleTransplantation2020

Patients With Persistently Low MELD-Na Scores Continue to Be at Risk of Liver-related Death.

Nikhilesh R Mazumder, Kofi Atiemo, Amna Daud, Abel Kho, Michael Abecassis, Josh Levitsky, Daniela P Ladner

Open access · greenAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Transplantation, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Update on Organ Allocation and Liver Transplantation.Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Where you live matters: Area deprivation predicts poor survival and liver transplant waitlisting.American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Management of refractory ascites.Clinical and molecular hepatology · 2023
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nikhilesh R MazumderNorthwestern University Transplant Research Collaborative (NUTORC), Comprehensive Transplant Center (CTC), Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL.
Kofi AtiemoNorthwestern University Transplant Research Collaborative (NUTORC), Comprehensive Transplant Center (CTC), Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL.
Amna DaudNorthwestern University Transplant Research Collaborative (NUTORC), Comprehensive Transplant Center (CTC), Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL.
Abel KhoCenter for Health Information Partnerships, Institute for Public Health and Medicine, Chicago, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL.
Michael AbecassisNorthwestern University Transplant Research Collaborative (NUTORC), Comprehensive Transplant Center (CTC), Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL.
Josh LevitskyDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL.
Daniela P LadnerNorthwestern University Transplant Research Collaborative (NUTORC), Comprehensive Transplant Center (CTC), Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL.
Northwestern University · US

Funding

Transplant Surgery Scientist Training ProgramT32DK077662 · NIDDK · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI Richard M Green, Daniela P Ladner · 2007 to 2026
$3.8M
NIDDK NIH HHS T32 DK077662
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe vast majority of patients with cirrhosis have low Model for End-Stage Liver Disease-Sodium (MELD-Na) scores; however, the ability for the MELD-Na score to predict patient outcomes at low scores is unclear.

methodsAdult patients in a multicenter, Chicago-wide database of medical records with International Classification of Disease, Ninth Edition codes of cirrhosis and without a history of hepatocellular carcinoma were included. Records were linked with the state death registry, and death certificates were manually reviewed. Deaths were classified as "liver-related," "non-liver-related," and "non-descript" as adjudicated by a panel comprised of a transplant surgeon, a hepatologist, and an internist. A sensitivity analysis was performed where patients with hepatocellular carcinoma were included.

resultsAmong 7922 identified patients, 3999 patients had MELD-Na scores that were never higher than 15. In total, 2137 (27%) patients died during the study period with higher mortality rates for the patients in the high MELD-Na group (19.4 (41.6%) versus 4.1 (12.6%) per 100 person-y, P < 0.001). The high MELD-Na group died of a liver-related cause in 1142 out of 1632 (70%) as compared to 240 out of 505 (47.5%) deaths in the low MELD-Na group. There was no difference in the distribution of subcategory of liver-related death between low and high MELD-Na groups. Among subclassification of liver-related deaths, the most common cause of death was "Infectious" in both groups.

conclusionsDespite persistently low MELD-Na scores, patients with cirrhosis still experience high rates of liver-related mortality.

Indexed as

Severity of Illness IndexAdultAgedCause of DeathChicagoDeath CertificatesDisease ProgressionEnd Stage Liver DiseaseFemaleHumansLiver CirrhosisLiver TransplantationMaleMiddle AgedPatient SelectionPrognosisSodium

Identifiers

PMID31644488
PMCPMC7192363
OpenAlexW2982184191

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.