Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31643028›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology2019

Immediate and long-term outcome of corrosive ingestion.

C Bharath Kumar, Sudipta Dhar Chowdhury, Soumya Kanti Ghatak, Devarakonda Sreekar, Reuben Thomas Kurien, Deepu David, Amit Kumar Dutta, Ebby George Simon, Anjilivelil Joseph Joseph

Abstract readEvaluation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Short-term and long-term management of caustic-induced gastrointestinal injury: An evidence-based practice guidelines.Indian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology · 2025
    Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

C Bharath KumarDepartment of Gastroenterology, Christian Medical College, Vellore, 632 004, India.
Sudipta Dhar ChowdhuryDepartment of Gastroenterology, Christian Medical College, Vellore, 632 004, India. sudiptadharchowdhury@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6484-0218
Soumya Kanti GhatakDepartment of Gastroenterology, Christian Medical College, Vellore, 632 004, India.
Devarakonda SreekarDepartment of Gastroenterology, Christian Medical College, Vellore, 632 004, India.
Reuben Thomas KurienDepartment of Gastroenterology, Christian Medical College, Vellore, 632 004, India.
Deepu DavidDepartment of Gastroenterology, Christian Medical College, Vellore, 632 004, India.
Amit Kumar DuttaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Christian Medical College, Vellore, 632 004, India.
Ebby George SimonDepartment of Gastroenterology, Christian Medical College, Vellore, 632 004, India.
Anjilivelil Joseph JosephDepartment of Gastroenterology, Christian Medical College, Vellore, 632 004, India.

Funding

Christian Medical College, Vellore IRB Min No: 9247
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCorrosive ingestion (CI) has short- and long-term consequences. The aim of this study was to assess the outcome of mucosal injury grade ≥ 2A.

methodsConsecutive patients between January 2008 and January 2015 who presented within 48 h of CI were included. Details of substance ingested, intent, symptoms, injury grade at endoscopy, and treatment were obtained by a review of medical records. Patients aged less than 15 years or injury grade less than 2A were excluded. Patients were followed up using a structured symptom-based questionnaire and barium swallow.

resultsA total of 112 patients were admitted with CI during the study period. Eighty-two patients were included in the study. There was no relationship between the presence of symptoms or oral mucosal injury and the grades of gastrointestinal mucosal injury. Grades 2B and 3A were the most common grades of mucosal injury. Five patients died at index hospitalization. Patients were followed up for a median period of 31 months (6-72) during which 11 patients were lost to follow up. During follow up, 2 patients with high-grade injury died as a consequence of CI and 4 died of unrelated causes. Sixteen (26.6%) patients remained symptomatic. Forty-three patients underwent barium swallow. Esophageal stricture was identified in 11 patients, gastric stricture in 8, and combined esophageal and gastric in 2. High-grade esophageal mucosal injury was associated with a high risk of stricture formation (p = 0.02).

conclusionsCI is associated with high immediate and long-term morbidity and mortality.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBurns, ChemicalCausticsEsophageal MucosaEsophageal StenosisFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient Outcome AssessmentTime FactorsYoung AdultCausticsCaustic ingestionCorrosive ingestionEsophageal stenosisPerforationStricture

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.