Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31643025›Full record

Trial reportPrevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research2020

The Effects of a Health Care-Based Brief Intervention on Dating Abuse Perpetration: Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Emily F Rothman, Gregory L Stuart, Timothy Heeren, Jennifer Paruk, Megan Bair-Merritt

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02080923 (A Brief Intervention to Prevent Adolescent Dating Aggression Perpetration), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02080923 nacompletednot on this map

A Brief Intervention to Prevent Adolescent Dating Aggression Perpetration

TypeinterventionalSponsorBoston UniversityRan2014 to 2017Enrolled220ConditionsOffensive Aggression, Sexual Aggression, Dating Violence Perpetration and VictimizationArmsBrief Motivational Interview
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Adaptation and feasibility assessment of a dating violence prevention program for girls in foster care.Psicologia, reflexao e critica : revista semestral do Departamento de Psicologia da UFRGS · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Emily F RothmanDepartment of Community Health Sciences, Boston University School of Public Health, Floor 4, 801 Massachusetts Avenue, Boston, MA, 02118, USA. erothman@bu.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-0113-2577
Gregory L StuartUniversity of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, USA.
Timothy HeerenDepartment of Community Health Sciences, Boston University School of Public Health, Floor 4, 801 Massachusetts Avenue, Boston, MA, 02118, USA.
Jennifer ParukDepartment of Community Health Sciences, Boston University School of Public Health, Floor 4, 801 Massachusetts Avenue, Boston, MA, 02118, USA.
Megan Bair-MerrittBoston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dating abuse (DA) is prevalent and consequential, yet there are no evidence-based interventions for the health care setting that prevent perpetration. The current study's purpose was to test a one-session brief motivational interview-style intervention to decrease DA perpetration. We conducted a two-arm RCT of the Real Talk intervention with follow-up at 3 and 6 months. Participants were 172 youth ages 15-19 years old, recruited from the pediatric emergency department or outpatient care services of an urban hospital in the USA in 2014-2017. The primary outcome was change in self-reported DA perpetration, including subtypes of DA such as physical, sexual, psychological, and cyber DA. Youth in both intervention and control arms reduced DA perpetration over time. GEE models indicated no overall intervention effects for any, physical, sexual, or psychological DA. There were overall effects for cyber DA (RR 0.49, 95% CI 0.27, 0.87). There were also effects at 3 months for psychological DA (RR 0.24, 95% CI 0.06, 0.93) and cyber DA (RR 0.39, 95% CI 0.19, 0.79). Analyses stratified by gender also found overall effects for males for any DA (RR 0.20, 95% CI 0.07, 0.55), physical DA (RR 0.30, 95% CI 0.10, 0.89), and cyber DA (RR 0.04, 95% CI 0.01, 0.27). For males, intervention effects on any DA persisted to 6 months (RR 0.13, 95% CI 0.02, 1.01). This health care-based one-session DA intervention is a potentially promising approach to reduce DA perpetration among adolescents.Clinical trial registration: This study is registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov NCT02080923.

Indexed as

AdolescentCrisis InterventionFemaleHumansIntimate Partner ViolenceMaleMotivational InterviewingProgram EvaluationSex OffensesYoung AdultBrief interventionDating abuseMotivational interviewPartner violence

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.