ArticleJournal of neuro-oncology2019
Treatment strategies for glioblastoma in older patients: age is just a number.
Article in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Advanced Age in Humans and Mouse Models of Glioblastoma Show Decreased Survival from Extratumoral Influence.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2023Article
- Sarcopenia Diagnosed Using Masseter Muscle Diameter as a Survival Correlate in Elderly Patients with Glioblastoma.World neurosurgery · 2022Article
- Retrospective single-center study on elderly patients with glioblastoma between 2014 and 2018 evaluating the effect of age and performance status on survival.Neuro-oncology practice · 2022Article
- Palliative care of older glioblastoma patients in neurosurgery.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2022Review
- Is there a limited value of cytoreductive surgery in elderly patients with malignant gliomas?Surgical neurology international · 2022Article
- Treatment approach and survival from glioblastoma: results from a population-based retrospective cohort study from Western Norway.BMJ open · 2021Article
- Prognostic and Predictive Factors in Elderly Patients With Glioblastoma: A Single-Center Retrospective Study.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2021Article
- Health-related quality of life and emotional well-being in patients with glioblastoma and their relatives.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2020Article
- Guiding Treatment Choices for Elderly Patients with Glioblastoma by a Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment.Current oncology reports · 2020Review
- Lack of survival advantage among re-resected elderly glioblastoma patients: a SEER-Medicare study.Neuro-oncology advancesArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
background/purposeOptimal care for elderly patients with glioblastoma (GBM) remains in question due to their exclusion from and underrepresentation in many clinical trials (including EORTC 22,981) as well as their historically poor overall survival.
methodsA retrospective chart review was conducted at a single high-volume cancer center for newly diagnosed elderly (65 years old or older) GBM patients diagnosed from 2011 through 2017.
resultsA total of 158 newly diagnosed GBM patients aged 65 years and older were identified. One hundred forty-four patients (91.1%) received radiotherapy (RT) and 130 patients (90.3%) received concurrent temozolomide with RT. Sixty-one patients (38.6%) completed concurrent chemoradiation and 6 cycles of adjuvant temozolomide. 23% of patients discontinued temozolomide during concurrent or adjuvant treatment due to side effects or complications of chemotherapy. With a median follow-up time of 35.0 months, median overall survival (OS) time for the full cohort was 18.6 months, with estimated OS rates of 74.8%, 35.9%, and 9.5% at 1, 2, and 5 years, respectively. On multivariable analysis, higher KPS (p = 0.002, HR 0.46; 95% CI 0.63-0.82), completing planned RT course (p = 0.01, HR 0.29; 95% CI 0.11-0.75), and completing 6 cycles of adjuvant temozolomide (p = 0.01, HR 2.62; 95% CI 1.67-4.12) were independently associated with improved OS.
conclusionsOur cohort of elderly GBM patients was predominantly treated with standard of care therapy based on EORTC 22,981. Despite their age, these patients generally tolerated treatment well and had favorable outcomes compared to those reported for patients treated on EORTC 22,981. Based on these findings, using advanced age as the basis for treatment de-escalation or as an exclusionary criterion in clinical trials should be discouraged.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.