ArticleSkeletal radiology2020
Correlating clinical assessment and MRI findings in diagnosing calf injuries in elite male Australian rules footballers.
Article in Skeletal radiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- MRI features of ERSA (exercise-related signal abnormality) lesions in professional soccer players.Skeletal radiology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveCalf complex injuries represent a significant injury burden among Australian Rules athletes. To date, there has been limited research correlating clinical and radiological findings of pathology within the calf. The objective of this study is to determine how accurately magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings correlate with clinical measures of calf muscle complex pathology in elite male athletes. MATERIALS AND
methodsA prospective cohort study was conducted on Australian rules elite athletes. A cohort of 45 athletes underwent a high-load training session of approximately 10 km of running. Athletes were then assessed by a sports physiotherapist who made a diagnosis of no pathology, delayed onset muscle soreness, strain or other. Subsequently, the athletes underwent MRI of their bilateral calf complexes. Radiologists interpreted the MRI findings and radiological diagnosis were correlated with clinical diagnosis.
resultsA total of 90 calf MRIs were performed. Correlation of clinical and radiological diagnosis occurred in 57 cases. Of the 33 cases which did not correlate, there were 4 radiologically significant acute calf strains in clinically asymptomatic athletes, 3 of which involved old scar tissue.
conclusionMRI may detect clinically insignificant injuries within the calf complex. If an athlete does not have any clinically relevant symptoms, abnormal signal on MRI may represent a different diagnosis to muscle strain. Signal change on MRI proximal to scar tissue may represent reactive oedema. Clinical history and examination should be correlated with radiological findings is recommended when diagnosing calf injury in elite athletes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.