Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31642969›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of colorectal disease2019

Epidemiology of and prognostic factors for appendiceal carcinomas: a retrospective, population-based study.

Shaobo Mo, Zheng Zhou, Zhen Ying, Weixing Dai, Wenqiang Xiang, Lingyu Han, Qingguo Li, Renjie Wang, Guoxiang Cai

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of colorectal disease, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Which is the appropriate surgical procedure for appendiceal adenocarcinoma: appendectomy, partial colectomy or right hemicolectomy?Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Shaobo MoDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, 200032, China.
Zheng ZhouDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, 200032, China.
Zhen YingDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, 200032, China.
Weixing DaiDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, 200032, China.
Wenqiang XiangDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, 200032, China.
Lingyu HanDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, 200032, China.
Qingguo LiDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, 200032, China.
Renjie WangDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, 200032, China. wangbladejay@sina.com.
Guoxiang CaiDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, 200032, China. gxcaifuscc@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2953-3460
Shanghai Medical College of Fudan University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe aim of this study is to evaluate the epidemiology of and prognostic factors for appendiceal carcinomas (ACs).

methodsAll cases of ACs registered in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database from 1973 to 2014 were retrospectively identified in this study. Age-adjusted incidence and survival rates were calculated.

resultsWe analyzed 7170 patients with ACs. We observed a significant increase in the reported annual age-adjusted incidence of ACs from 1973 (0.18/100,000) to 2014 (1.11/100,000). The elevation of the incidence was noted in all the histological types, stages, and grades. The most common histological type varied by race, with the appendiceal mucinous adenocarcinoma (AMA) being the most common in white, Asian/Pacific Islander, and American Indian/Alaskan Native patients, and the appendiceal adenocarcinoma (AA) being the most common in African American patients. In multivariate analysis of patients with all ACs, gender (P < 0.001), year of diagnosis (P < 0.001), age (P < 0.001), race (P < 0.001), tumor grade (P < 0.001), disease stage (P < 0.001), retrieved regional lymph nodes (P < 0.001), type of surgery performed (P = 0.002), and histologic subtype (P < 0.001) were predictors of outcome. Survival time for all ACs increased from the 1973-1993 period to the 1994-2014 period (HR 0.76; 95% CI, 0.69 to 0.85). Additionally, the 5-year survival rates were 88% for malignant carcinoid, 70% for goblet cell carcinoid, 51% for colonic type adenocarcinoma, 59% for mucinous adenocarcinoma, and 25% for signet ring cell type.

conclusionsWe observed increased reported incidence of ACs and increased survival durations over time, suggesting that clinicians pay more attention to ACs and mastering the characteristic of these tumors.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAppendiceal NeoplasmsFemaleHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingPrognosisRacial GroupsRetrospective StudiesSEER ProgramSurvival AnalysisAppendiceal carcinomaEpidemiologyIncidencePrognostic factorsSurvival outcomes

Identifiers

PMID31642969
OpenAlexW2981827000

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.