Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31642961›Full record

ArticleJournal of cancer research and clinical oncology2020

Prolonged time to treatment initiation in advanced pancreatic cancer patients has no major effect on treatment outcome: a retrospective cohort study controlled for lead time bias and waiting time paradox.

Stephan Kruger, Karoline Schirle, Michael Haas, Alexander Crispin, Jörg Schirra, Julia Mayerle, Jan G D'Haese, Wolfgang G Kunz, Jens Ricke, Steffen Ormanns and 9 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Hepatopancreatobiliary malignancies: time to treatment matters.Journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Stephan KrugerDepartment of Medicine III, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany. stephan.kruger@med.uni-muenchen.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4138-9863
Karoline SchirleDepartment of Medicine III, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.
Michael HaasDepartment of Medicine III, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.
Alexander CrispinInstitute of Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Jörg SchirraDepartment of Medicine II, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Julia MayerleDepartment of Medicine II, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Jan G D'HaeseDepartment of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Wolfgang G KunzDepartment of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Jens RickeDepartment of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Steffen OrmannsInstitute of Pathology, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Thomas KirchnerInstitute of Pathology, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Sebastian KoboldDivision of Clinical Pharmacology and Center for Integrated Protein Science Munich (CIPSM), University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Matthias IlmerDepartment of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Leonie GebauerDepartment of Medicine III, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.
Christoph B WestphalenDepartment of Medicine III, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.
Michael von Bergwelt-BaildonDepartment of Medicine III, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.
Jens WernerDepartment of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Volker HeinemannDepartment of Medicine III, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.
Stefan BoeckDepartment of Medicine III, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeA prolonged time to treatment initiation (TTI) correlates with an adverse prognosis in different cancer types including resectable pancreatic cancer (PC). Only limited evidence on the correlation between TTI and prognosis in advanced PC exists.

methodsConsecutive PC patients (n = 368) who were diagnosed or treated at our high-volume comprehensive cancer center were included in a prospectively maintained database. We retrospectively analyzed time from first imaging showing advanced PC to initiation of palliative first-line chemotherapy. Lead time bias and waiting time paradox were addressed by landmark analysis and correlation of tumor burden with TTI.

resultsTwo hundred and ninety-seven patients met the pre-specified in- and exclusion criteria of our study. Median TTI was 29 days (range: 1-124 days). Most common reasons for prolonged TTI (> 21 days) were referral from an external treatment center (39%) and a second biopsy (31%). A TTI above the median-, 75th or 90th percentile (43 or 60 days, respectively) had no impact on overall survival. Furthermore, no correlation between levels of carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA 19-9) at time of treatment initiation and TTI was observed.

conclusionWhile a timely work-up of advanced PC patients remains important, delays in treatment initiation due to repeated biopsies, inclusion in a clinical study or transfer to a specialized cancer center appear to be justified in light of the absence of a strong adverse effect of prolonged TTI on prognosis in advanced PC patients.

Indexed as

Time-to-TreatmentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCA-19-9 AntigenCarcinoma, Pancreatic DuctalCohort StudiesDeoxycytidineFemaleFluorouracilGemcitabineHumansMaleMiddle AgedPalliative CareCA-19-9 AntigenDeoxycytidineFluorouracilGemcitabineDuctal adenocarcinomaLead time biasPancreatic cancerTime to treatment initiationTreatment delayWaiting time paradox

Identifiers

PMID31642961
PMCPMC11804758

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.