Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31642402›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2019

StartReact effects are dependent on engagement of startle reflex circuits: support for a subcortically mediated initiation pathway.

Victoria Smith, Dana Maslovat, Anthony N Carlsen

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. What Is the StartReact Effect?Acta physiologica (Oxford, England) · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Enhanced Muscle Activation Using Robotic Assistance Within the Electromechanical Delay: Implications for Rehabilitation?IEEE transactions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Evidence for Subcortical Plasticity after Paired Stimulation from a Wearable Device.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2021
    Article
  13. Temporal binding and agency under startle.Experimental brain research · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Victoria SmithSchool of Human Kinetics, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.
Dana MaslovatSchool of Kinesiology, University of British Columbia, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-4383-6046
Anthony N CarlsenSchool of Human Kinetics, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-6015-8991
University of Ottawa · CAUniversity of British Columbia · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The "StartReact" effect refers to the rapid involuntary triggering of a prepared movement in response to a loud startling acoustic stimulus (SAS). This effect is typically confirmed by the presence of short-latency electromyographic activity in startle reflex-related muscles such as the sternocleidomastoid (SCM); however, there is debate regarding the specific neural pathways involved in the StartReact effect. Some research has implicated a subcortically mediated pathway, which would predict different response latencies depending on the presence of a startle reflex. Alternatively, other research has suggested that this effect involves the same pathways responsible for voluntary response initiation and simply reflects higher preparatory activation levels, and thus faster voluntary initiation. To distinguish between these competing hypotheses, the present study assessed preparation level during a simple reaction time (RT) task involving wrist extension in response to a control tone or a SAS. Premotor RT and startle circuitry engagement (as measured by SCM activation) were determined for each trial. Additionally, preparation level at the go signal on each trial was measured using motor-evoked potentials (MEP) elicited by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). Results showed that SAS trial RTs were significantly shorter (

Indexed as

Acoustic StimulationAdultEvoked Potentials, MotorFemaleHumansMaleMotor ActivityNeural PathwaysReaction TimeReflex, StartleTranscranial Magnetic StimulationYoung Adultmotor-evoked potentialpreparationreaction timestartle reflexTMS

Identifiers

PMID31642402
PMCPMC6966318
OpenAlexW2981810404

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.