Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31642210›Full record

ArticleCancer medicine2019

Prognosis in triple-negative apocrine carcinomas of the breast: A population-based study.

Wenyu Wu, Meiying Wu, Guowen Peng, Degang Shi, Jian Zhang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Rare Breast Cancers Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Rare Breast Cancer Subtypes.Current oncology reports · 2021
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Wenyu WuDepartment of Oncology, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.ORCID 0000-0001-8579-2454
Meiying WuDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, The Ninth Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Beihai, China.
Guowen PengTarget and Interventional Therapy Department of Oncology, First People's Hospital of Foshan, Foshan, China.
Degang ShiTarget and Interventional Therapy Department of Oncology, First People's Hospital of Foshan, Foshan, China.
Jian ZhangDepartment of Oncology, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.ORCID 0000-0001-7217-0111
First People's Hospital of Foshan · CNGuangxi Medical University · CNZhujiang Hospital · CN

Funding

Foshan Science and Technology Bureau Foundation 2017AG100171
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTriple-negative apocrine carcinoma (TNAC) of the breast is a very rare type of breast cancer. Furthermore, the clinicopathological features, prognosis, and potential impact of treatment strategies in TNAC remain unclear.

methodsData from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program were used to identify breast cancer patients diagnosed between 2010 and 2016 with TNAC and triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC, IDC [invasive ductal carcinoma], NOS [not otherwise specified]). Chi-squared tests were used to examine the categorical variables between the two groups. Overall survival (OS) of TNAC and TNBC was assessed by Kaplan-Meier analyses and Cox regression. Breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) was evaluated by Nelson-Aalen analyses and competing risk regression.

resultsWe identified 31 362 patients from the SEER database, including 366 patients with TNAC and 30 996 patients with TNBC. TNAC was correlated with older age, lower T stage and lower tumor grade. Patients with TNAC had better OS compared with TNBC patients; the 5-year OS rates were 82.2% vs 73.5% (P < .001). The breast cancer-related death rate was significantly lower in patients with TNAC than in patients with TNBC, with a 5-year cumulative incidence of 9.1% vs 22.9% (P < .001). Chemotherapy was significantly associated with improved OS in TNAC patients, but radiotherapy was not associated with OS in TNAC patients. In the multivariable Cox regression, TNAC was still associated with improved OS (HR [hazard ratio], 0.61; 95% CI [confidence interval] 0.45-0.83; P = .002). In the multivariable competing risk regression, the significantly higher BCSS in patients with TNAC compared patients with TNBC remained (subdistribution HR [SHR], 0.42; 95% CI, 0.27-0.64; P < .001).

conclusionPatients with TNAC had a better prognosis than patients with TNBC, and chemotherapy was associated with survival advantages in TNAC patients.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedCarcinoma, Ductal, BreastFemaleHumansMiddle AgedNeoplasm GradingNeoplasm StagingPrognosisProportional Hazards ModelsPublic Health SurveillanceSEER ProgramTriple Negative Breast NeoplasmsYoung Adultapocrine carcinomaprognosisSEER databasetriple-negative breast cancer

Identifiers

PMID31642210
PMCPMC6912034
OpenAlexW2981993854

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.