ArticleCancer medicine2019
Prognosis in triple-negative apocrine carcinomas of the breast: A population-based study.
Article in Cancer medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis of breast carcinoma with apocrine differentiation: a propensity score-matched analysis of the SEER database.Translational cancer research · 2026Article
- The clinical relevance of apocrine morphology in breast cancer depends on the estrogen receptor status.NPJ breast cancer · 2026Article
- Chemotherapy is associated with differential survival outcomes in apocrine carcinoma: A nationwide cohort study from the Japanese National Clinical Database-Breast Cancer Registry.Breast (Edinburgh, Scotland) · 2026Observational
- The development of Breast Apocrine Carcinoma (BAC) score that distinguishes breast and cutaneous apocrine carcinomas.Research square · 2026Article
- Clinicopathological observation and initial exploration of characteristic biomarkers in breast apocrine carcinoma.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Article
- Proteomics characterization of triple-negative apocrine carcinoma reveals molecular features of progression and chemotherapy response.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Triple-Negative Apocrine Carcinoma: Largest Cohort Highlights Unique Biology and Survival Advantage.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Article
- Article
- Rare Breast Cancers Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Clinicopathological Characteristics and Prognosis of Triple-Negative Apocrine Carcinoma: A Case-Control Study.World journal of oncology · 2023Article
- Clinical Features and Prognoses of Patients With Breast Cancer Who Underwent Surgery.JAMA network open · 2023Article
- Triple-negative breast cancer: from none to multiple therapeutic targets in two decades.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Review
- HER2-positive apocrine carcinoma of the breast: a population-based analysis of treatment and outcome.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2022Article
- Triple Negative Breast Cancer: An Analysis of the Subtypes and the Effects of Menopausal Status on Invasive Breast Cancer.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
- Triple-Negative Apocrine Breast Carcinoma Has Better Prognosis despite Poor Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
- Triple-negative apocrine carcinoma as a rare cause of a breast lump in a Syrian female: a case report and review of the literature.BMC women's health · 2021Review
- Rare Breast Cancer Subtypes.Current oncology reports · 2021Review
- Neoadjuvant targeted therapy for apocrine carcinoma of the breast: A case report.World journal of clinical cases · 2020Article
- Prognosis in triple-negative apocrine carcinomas of the breast: A population-based study.Cancer medicine · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTriple-negative apocrine carcinoma (TNAC) of the breast is a very rare type of breast cancer. Furthermore, the clinicopathological features, prognosis, and potential impact of treatment strategies in TNAC remain unclear.
methodsData from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program were used to identify breast cancer patients diagnosed between 2010 and 2016 with TNAC and triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC, IDC [invasive ductal carcinoma], NOS [not otherwise specified]). Chi-squared tests were used to examine the categorical variables between the two groups. Overall survival (OS) of TNAC and TNBC was assessed by Kaplan-Meier analyses and Cox regression. Breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) was evaluated by Nelson-Aalen analyses and competing risk regression.
resultsWe identified 31 362 patients from the SEER database, including 366 patients with TNAC and 30 996 patients with TNBC. TNAC was correlated with older age, lower T stage and lower tumor grade. Patients with TNAC had better OS compared with TNBC patients; the 5-year OS rates were 82.2% vs 73.5% (P < .001). The breast cancer-related death rate was significantly lower in patients with TNAC than in patients with TNBC, with a 5-year cumulative incidence of 9.1% vs 22.9% (P < .001). Chemotherapy was significantly associated with improved OS in TNAC patients, but radiotherapy was not associated with OS in TNAC patients. In the multivariable Cox regression, TNAC was still associated with improved OS (HR [hazard ratio], 0.61; 95% CI [confidence interval] 0.45-0.83; P = .002). In the multivariable competing risk regression, the significantly higher BCSS in patients with TNAC compared patients with TNBC remained (subdistribution HR [SHR], 0.42; 95% CI, 0.27-0.64; P < .001).
conclusionPatients with TNAC had a better prognosis than patients with TNBC, and chemotherapy was associated with survival advantages in TNAC patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.