Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31642041›Full record

Observational studyMolecular biology reports2020

Rapid detection of bacteria in bloodstream infections using a molecular method: a pilot study with a neonatal diagnostic kit.

Iolanda Mazzucchelli, Francesca Garofoli, Micol Angelini, Carmine Tinelli, Chryssoula Tzialla, Lidia Decembrino

Registry-linked trialAbstract readObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in Molecular biology reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03884894 (PCR Technique of a Commercial Test and Blood Culture to Early Detect Sepsis in NICU), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03884894 completednot on this map

PCR Technique of a Commercial Test and Blood Culture to Early Detect Sepsis in NICU

TypeobservationalSponsorFrancesca GarofoliRan2015 to 2017Enrolled69ConditionsSepsisArmsmolecular assay, Blood culture
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Iolanda MazzucchelliDepartment of Internal Medicine and Therapeutics, Unit of Rheumatology, University of Pavia and IRCCS Policlinico S. Matteo Foundation, 27100, Pavia, Italy. iolanda.mazzucchelli@unipv.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2715-0685
Francesca GarofoliNeonatal Immunology Laboratory, UOC Neonatology and Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy.
Micol AngeliniNeonatal Immunology Laboratory, UOC Neonatology and Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy.
Carmine TinelliClinical Epidemiology and Biometric Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy.
Chryssoula TziallaUOC Neonatology and Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy.
Lidia DecembrinoUOC Neonatology and Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy.
Policlinico San Matteo Fondazione · ITUniversity of Pavia · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neonatal sepsis is a life-threatening condition and its early diagnosis is crucial for infant survival. Identifying responsible pathogens is a key step. Blood culture (BC) is the gold standard, but more rapid and specific diagnostic methods are needed. We evaluated the reliability and utility of 3 h turnaround time diagnostic molecular kit, "EuSepScreen lattanti "CE IVD marked, (EuSepScreen lattanti, Eurospital Spa Trieste, Italy) specifically targeted to detect 4 pathogens in neonatal sepsis: Klebsiella pneumoniae (KP), Escherichia coli (EC), Streptococcus agalactiae (GBS), and Lysteria monocytogenes. We evaluated 69 neonates, 40 full term and 29 preterm infants, with suspected bloodstream infection, who, overall the routine clinical procedures, were tested using the molecular kit. Kit results were compared to BC outcomes. Nineteen cases for early onset sepsis (EOS) were evaluated, 2 of them resulted positive to a molecular kit and to BC (both for GBS and EC). In the 50 cases of suspected late onset sepsis (LOS), 7 infants reported positive and coincident results to both the methods, in 3 further cases the molecular kit identified pathogens (EC) in neonates with negative BC result; in 10 cases BC revealed etiological pathogens exceeding the molecular kit possibility of identification. In case of EOS, results of the molecular kit were coincident to these of BC, but available in 3 h turnaround time, which is an advantage, so the kit may actually be an "add-on tool" for EOS, with reference to EC and GBS, but a larger study with a greater number of EOS cases are needed to validate its usefulness in the NICU. Regarding LOS the restricted panel of identifiable microorganisms failed to provide timely information for sepsis diagnosis, highlighting the need of enlarged number microorganisms for the diagnosis of LOS.Trial registration number: NCT03884894.

Indexed as

BacteremiaBacteriaFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornInfant, PrematureItalyMaleNeonatal SepsisPilot ProjectsReagent Kits, DiagnosticRisk FactorsSepsisReagent Kits, DiagnosticBlood cultureBloodstream infection diagnosisMolecular assayNewborns

Identifiers

PMID31642041
OpenAlexW2981666338

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.