Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31642002›Full record

ArticleBrazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology]2020

Plant growth promoting and antifungal activity in endophytic Bacillus strains from pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum).

Prity Kushwaha, Prem Lal Kashyap, Alok Kumar Srivastava, Rajesh Kumar Tiwari

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology], 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
9.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 87 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Epiphytic bacteria from Tacinga inamoena (K. Schum.) N.P. Taylor & Stuppy improve plant growth in cucumber seedlings.International microbiology : the official journal of the Spanish Society for Microbiology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Enhancing Growth inMicroorganisms · 2024
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. From Sea to Soil: Marine Bacillus subtilis enhancing chickpea production through in vitro and in vivo plant growth promoting traits.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2024
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Plant Growth Promotion UsingInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Prity KushwahaICAR-National Bureau of Agriculturally Important Microorganisms (NBAIM), Mau, 275103, India.
Prem Lal KashyapICAR- Indian Institute of Wheat and Barley Research (IIWBR), Karnal, 132001, India. plkashyap@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1405-4814
Alok Kumar SrivastavaICAR-National Bureau of Agriculturally Important Microorganisms (NBAIM), Mau, 275103, India.
Rajesh Kumar TiwariAMITY Institute of Biotechnology, AMITY University Lucknow Campus, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, 226028, India.
National Bureau of Agriculturally Important Microorganisms · INIndian Institute of Wheat and Barley Research · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bacterial endophytes are well known inhabitants of living plant system and perform important assignments in maintaining plant growth and health. Currently, limited reports are available on the endophytes of pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum) reflecting antagonistic and plant growth promoting (PGP) attributes. Therefore, the major objectives of current investigation were to identify antagonistic strains of endophytic Bacillus from pearl millet and further illustrate their PGP capabilities. In this study, 19 endophytic Bacillus strains (EPP5, EPP21, EPP30, EPP32, EPP35, EPP42, EPP49, EPP55, EPP62, EPP65, EPP70, EPP71, EPP74, EPP78, EPP83, EPP86, EPP93, EPP100, and EPP102) displaying antagonistic activity towards Rhizoctonia solani (RS), Sclerotium rolfsii (SR), and Fusarium solani (FS) were isolated from different sections (root, leaf, stem, and root) of pearl millet. Phenotypic (shape, colony, gram staining reaction, endospore formation, and motility) and biochemical features (catalase, oxidase, citrate, gelatinase, urease, Voges Proskauer's, methyl red, indole, and nitrate reduction), along with the similarly comparison of 16S rRNA gene sequence with type strains identified eight antagonistic endophyhtes as B. amyloliquefaciens (EPP35, EPP 42, EPP62, and EPP 102), Bacillus subtilis subsp. subtilis (EPP65), and Bacillus cereus (EPP5, EPP71, and EPP74). The production of indole acetic acid and siderophores was varied among the isolated endophytes. Besides displaying enzymatic activities, these isolates varied in solubilizing capabilities of phosphate, potassium, and zinc. The presence of three antimicrobial peptide genes (ituD, bmyC, and srfA) also confirmed their antifungal nature. Further, single treatment of three promising strains (EPP5, EPP62, and EPP65) offered protection ranging from 35.68 to 45.74% under greenhouse conditions. However, microbial consortium (EPP5+ EPP62 + EPP65) provided the highest protection (71.96%) against root rot and wilt infection with significant increase in plant biomass. Overall, the current study indicated that pearl millet plant harbors various species of endophytic Bacillus that possess excellent biocontrol and growth promotion activities.

Indexed as

PennisetumPlant DiseasesAntifungal AgentsBacillusBacillus amyloliquefaciensBacillus cereusBacillus subtilisBasidiomycotaBiological Control AgentsEndophytesFusariumGenes, BacterialIndoleacetic AcidsMicrobial ConsortiaMicrobial InteractionsPhosphatesAntifungal AgentsBiological Control Agentsindoleacetic acidIndoleacetic AcidsPhosphatesPotassiumSiderophoresZincAntagonismBacillomycinIturinRoot rotSiderophoresStressSurfactinZinc solubilization

Identifiers

PMID31642002
PMCPMC7058731
OpenAlexW2981716405

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.