Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31641869›Full record

ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2020

A qualitative analysis of the benefits and barriers of support groups for patients with brain tumours and their caregivers.

Sasha Mallya, Maureen Daniels, Cheryl Kanter, Alyson Stone, Amanda Cipolla, Kim Edelstein, Norma D'Agostino

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Empowerment among breast cancer survivors using an online peer support community.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024
    Article
  9. The impact of a primary brain tumor diagnosis on caregivers: Insights from the patients' perspective.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Transportation as a barrier to colorectal cancer care.BMC health services research · 2021
    Article
  16. The benefits of support groups for caregivers of patients with brain tumors.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2020
    Article
  17. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sasha MallyaDepartment of Supportive Care, UHN - Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, 610 University Ave, 18-716, Toronto, ON, M5G 2M9, Canada.
Maureen DanielsDepartment of Supportive Care, UHN - Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, 610 University Ave, 18-716, Toronto, ON, M5G 2M9, Canada.
Cheryl KanterDepartment of Supportive Care, UHN - Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, 610 University Ave, 18-716, Toronto, ON, M5G 2M9, Canada.
Alyson StoneDepartment of Supportive Care, UHN - Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, 610 University Ave, 18-716, Toronto, ON, M5G 2M9, Canada.
Amanda CipollaDepartment of Supportive Care, UHN - Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, 610 University Ave, 18-716, Toronto, ON, M5G 2M9, Canada.
Kim EdelsteinDepartment of Supportive Care, UHN - Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, 610 University Ave, 18-716, Toronto, ON, M5G 2M9, Canada. kim.edelstein@uhn.ca.
Norma D'AgostinoDepartment of Supportive Care, UHN - Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, 610 University Ave, 18-716, Toronto, ON, M5G 2M9, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeBrain tumours represent a significant burden for patients and caregivers. The aims of the present study were to explore the perceived benefits of support groups for patients and their caregivers, as well as the barriers to participation, and to generate suggestions for improvement.

methodsBrain tumour patients and caregivers were recruited from the brain tumour centre at Princess Margaret Cancer Centre to participate in focus groups. Focus groups were audio-recorded, transcribed, and thematically analysed using qualitative methods. Eight patients (five who had attended the support groups and three who had not) and eight caregivers (all of whom attended the groups) participated in separate focus groups.

resultsFive major themes emerged: group cohesion (e.g., camaraderie and kinship), motivating factors to attend (e.g., loneliness), logistical factors that affected attendance (e.g., transportation), structure and content of the group (e.g., discussion topics), and suggestions for improvement (e.g., receiving personal reminders).

conclusionsThis study highlights the supportive needs of brain tumour patients and their caregivers. The key findings provide helpful information on how to maximise the benefits of support groups for these populations.

Indexed as

Psychosocial Support SystemsSelf-Help GroupsAdultBrain NeoplasmsCaregiversFemaleFocus GroupsHumansMaleMiddle AgedMotivationQualitative ResearchSocial SupportFocus groupsNeuro-oncologyPsychosocial oncologyQuality of life

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.