Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31641793›Full record

ReviewDer Nervenarzt2019

[Wearables for context-triggered assessment in psychiatry].

U W Ebner-Priemer, M Reichert, H Tost, A Meyer-Lindenberg

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Nervenarzt, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

U W Ebner-PriemerMental mHealth Lab, Lehrstuhl für Angewandte Psychologie, Institut für Sport und Sportwissenschaft, Karlsruher Institut für Technologie, Engler-Bunte-Ring 15, Geb. 40.40, 76131, Karlsruhe, Deutschland. ulrich.ebner-priemer@kit.edu.
M ReichertMental mHealth Lab, Lehrstuhl für Angewandte Psychologie, Institut für Sport und Sportwissenschaft, Karlsruher Institut für Technologie, Engler-Bunte-Ring 15, Geb. 40.40, 76131, Karlsruhe, Deutschland.
H TostKlinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Zentralinstitut für Seelische Gesundheit, Medizinische Fakultät Mannheim, Universität Heidelberg, J5, Mannheim, 76131, Deutschland.
A Meyer-LindenbergKlinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Zentralinstitut für Seelische Gesundheit, Medizinische Fakultät Mannheim, Universität Heidelberg, J5, Mannheim, 76131, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The breathtaking technological progress in the field of mobile computing, smartphones and wearables offers new opportunities for psychiatric research and therapy. Wearables enable not only the objective assessment of psychiatric symptoms in real time and everyday life but using continuous monitoring and analysis of relevant parameters can also define important situations, contexts and timing during which extended assessment strategies and real-life interventions can be implemented. The momentary effect of inner city green space exposure on well-being, motivational behavior feedback and geofencing for the detection of drinking episodes are used as examples to illustrate the core benefits of real-time analyses and feedback from wearables for psychiatric research and therapy.

Indexed as

PsychiatryWearable Electronic DevicesHumansMental DisordersAmbulatory assessmentElectronic diaryGeofencingMobile sensingTriggered assessment

Identifiers

PMID31641793

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.