Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31641627›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of endocrinology and metabolism

Prospective Study of Bethesda Categories III and IV Thyroid Nodules: Outcomes and Predictive Value of BRAF

Shiga Rappai Chirayath, Praveen V Pavithran, Nithya Abraham, Vasantha Nair, Nisha Bhavani, Harish Kumar, Usha V Menon, Arun S Menon

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of endocrinology and metabolism. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Shiga Rappai ChirayathDepartment of Endocrinology, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Center, Kochi, Kerala, India.
Praveen V PavithranDepartment of Endocrinology, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Center, Kochi, Kerala, India.
Nithya AbrahamDepartment of Endocrinology, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Center, Kochi, Kerala, India.
Vasantha NairDepartment of Endocrinology, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Center, Kochi, Kerala, India.
Nisha BhavaniDepartment of Endocrinology, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Center, Kochi, Kerala, India.
Harish KumarDepartment of Endocrinology, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Center, Kochi, Kerala, India.
Usha V MenonDepartment of Endocrinology, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Center, Kochi, Kerala, India.
Arun S MenonDepartment of Endocrinology, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Center, Kochi, Kerala, India.
Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAtypia of undetermined significance or follicular lesion of undetermined significance (AUS/FLUS) of The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology (TBSRTC) has emerged as the most controversial category because of its heterogeneity and inconsistent reporting. There is a definite paucity in data available from the Indian subcontinent about the outcome of nodules carrying Bethesda category III or Bethesda category IV diagnoses. AIMS AND

objectivesThe primary objective of our study was to determine the malignancy rate in Bethesda categories III and IV nodules. The secondary objectives were to determine predictive value of BRAF MATERIALS AND

methodsThis prospective study included 176 consecutive nodules of Bethesda categories III and IV, diagnosed over a period of 2 years from August 2015 to August 2017. A part of the fine needle aspirate was used to perform the BRAFV600E mutation analysis. The malignancy risk associated with these Fine needle aspiration Cytology categories were discussed with the patients. Those with Bethesda category IV diagnosis was advised surgery, whereas those with Bethesda category III were given the options of close follow-up with repeat FNA in 3 months or immediate surgery.

resultsIn our prospective study, there were 176 consecutive samples of categories III (140/79.5%) and IV (36/20.5%). Seventy-five (53.6%) category III nodules and 29 (80.6%) category IV nodules underwent immediate surgical excision. Fifty-five consecutive indeterminate cytology nodules were subjected for BRAF

conclusionMalignancy rate in Category III at our center was much higher than that described by ATA and by other studies published from centers around the world, including the only two studies from India. In view of the strikingly high malignancy rate in these indeterminate nodules, strong consideration to surgery should be given to patients with FNA results suggesting these two categories. BRAFV600E mutation analysis in FNA specimen has limited utility in improving the preoperative diagnostic rate for malignancy.

Indexed as

Atypia of undetermined significancefine needle aspiration cytologyfollicular lesion of undetermined significancesuspicious for follicular neoplasmthe bethesda system of reporting thyroid cytopathology

Identifiers

PMID31641627
PMCPMC6683685
OpenAlexW2964395518

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.