Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31641526›Full record

ArticleFungal biology and biotechnology2019

Practical guidance for the implementation of the CRISPR genome editing tool in filamentous fungi.

Min Jin Kwon, Tabea Schütze, Sebastian Spohner, Stefan Haefner, Vera Meyer

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Fungal biology and biotechnology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The antifungal peptide AnAFP fromFrontiers in microbiology · 2024
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. CRISPR/Cas9-Based Genome Editing and Its Application inJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Min Jin Kwon1Chair of Applied and Molecular Microbiology, Institute of Biotechnology, Technische Universität Berlin, 10263 Berlin, Germany.
Tabea Schütze1Chair of Applied and Molecular Microbiology, Institute of Biotechnology, Technische Universität Berlin, 10263 Berlin, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7630-3794
Sebastian Spohner2BASF SE, Carl-Bosch-Strasse 38, 67056 Ludwigshafen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5671-9370
Stefan Haefner2BASF SE, Carl-Bosch-Strasse 38, 67056 Ludwigshafen, Germany.
Vera Meyer1Chair of Applied and Molecular Microbiology, Institute of Biotechnology, Technische Universität Berlin, 10263 Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2298-2258
Technische Universität Berlin · DERobert Bosch (Germany) · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWithin the last years, numerous reports described successful application of the CRISPR nucleases Cas9 and Cpf1 for genome editing in filamentous fungi. However, still a lot of efforts are invested to develop and improve protocols for the fungus and genes of interest with respect to applicability, scalability and targeting efficiencies. These efforts are often hampered by the fact that-although many different protocols are available-none have systematically analysed and compared different CRISPR nucleases and different application procedures thereof for the efficiency of single- and multiplex-targeting approaches in the same fungus.

resultsWe present here data for successful genome editing in the cell factory

conclusionWe provide here the first comprehensive analysis and evaluation of different CRISPR approaches for a filamentous fungus. All approaches followed enabled successful genome editing in

Indexed as

Cas12aCas9Cell factoryCpf1CRISPRFilamentous fungiGenome editingMultiplexingMyceliophthora thermophilaRNPSelection-free gene targetingThermothelomyces thermophilus

Identifiers

PMID31641526
PMCPMC6796461
OpenAlexW2980436675

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.