Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31641470›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2019

How do trees respond to species mixing in experimental compared to observational studies?

Stephan Kambach, Eric Allan, Simon Bilodeau-Gauthier, David A Coomes, Josephine Haase, Tommaso Jucker, Georges Kunstler, Sandra Müller, Charles Nock, Alain Paquette and 21 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

31 authors.

Stephan KambachInstitute of Biology/Geobotany and Botanical Garden Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg Halle Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3585-5837
Eric AllanInstitute of Plant Sciences University of Bern Bern Switzerland.
Simon Bilodeau-GauthierDirection de la Recherche Forestière (DRF) Ministry of Forests, Wildlife and Parks Québec City QC Canada.
David A CoomesForest Ecology and Conservation Group Department of Plant Sciences University of Cambridge Cambridge UK.
Josephine HaaseGeobotany Faculty of Biology University of Freiburg Freiburg Germany.
Tommaso JuckerSchool of Biological Sciences University of Bristol Bristol UK.
Georges KunstlerUniv. Grenoble Alpes, Irstea, UR LESSEM Grenoble France.
Sandra MüllerGeobotany Faculty of Biology University of Freiburg Freiburg Germany.
Charles NockGeobotany Faculty of Biology University of Freiburg Freiburg Germany.
Alain PaquetteCentre for Forest Research (CEF) Université du Québec à Montréal Montréal QC Canada.
Fons van der PlasDepartment of Systematic Botany and Functional Biodiversity Institute of Biology Leipzig University Leipzig Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4680-543X
Sophia RatcliffeDepartment of Systematic Botany and Functional Biodiversity Institute of Biology Leipzig University Leipzig Germany.
Fabian RogerCentre for Environmental and Climate Research Lund University, Ekologihuset Lund Sweden.
Paloma Ruiz-BenitoForest Ecology and Restoration Group Department of Life Sciences Universidad de Alcalá Alcalá de Henares Madrid Spain.
Michael Scherer-LorenzenGeobotany Faculty of Biology University of Freiburg Freiburg Germany.
Harald AugeDepartment of Community Ecology Helmholtz-Centre for Environmental Research - UFZ Halle Germany.
Olivier BouriaudUniversity Stefan cel Mare of Suceava Suceava Romania.
Bastien CastagneyrolBIOGECO INRA Université de Bordeaux Cestas France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8795-7806
Jonas DahlgrenSwedish University of Agricultural Sciences Umeå Sweden.
Lars GamfeldtDepartment of Marine Sciences University of Gothenburg Gothenburg Sweden.
Hervé JactelBIOGECO INRA Université de Bordeaux Cestas France.
Gerald KändlerForest Research Institute Baden-Wurttemberg Freiburg Germany.
Julia KorichevaSchool of Biological Sciences Royal Holloway University of London Egham UK.
Aleksi LehtonenNatural Resources Institute Finland (Luke) Helsinki Finland.
Bart MuysDepartment of Earth and Environmental Sciences University of Leuven Leuven Belgium.
Quentin PonetteEarth and Life Institute Environmental Sciences Université catholique de Louvain (UCLouvain) Louvain-la-Neuve Belgium.
Nuri SetiawanForest & Nature Lab Department of Environment Ghent University Gontrode Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3076-5824
Thomas Van de PeerDepartment of Earth and Environmental Sciences University of Leuven Leuven Belgium.
Kris VerheyenForest & Nature Lab Department of Environment Ghent University Gontrode Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2067-9108
Miguel A ZavalaForest Ecology and Restoration Group Department of Life Sciences Universidad de Alcalá Alcalá de Henares Madrid Spain.
Helge BruelheideInstitute of Biology/Geobotany and Botanical Garden Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg Halle Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3135-0356

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For decades, ecologists have investigated the effects of tree species diversity on tree productivity at different scales and with different approaches ranging from observational to experimental study designs. Using data from five European national forest inventories (16,773 plots), six tree species diversity experiments (584 plots), and six networks of comparative plots (169 plots), we tested whether tree species growth responses to species mixing are consistent and therefore transferrable between those different research approaches. Our results confirm the general positive effect of tree species mixing on species growth (16% on average) but we found no consistency in species-specific responses to mixing between any of the three approaches, even after restricting comparisons to only those plots that shared similar mixtures compositions and forest types. These findings highlight the necessity to consider results from different research approaches when selecting species mixtures that should maximize positive forest biodiversity and functioning relationships.

Indexed as

biodiversityecosystem function and servicesFunDivEUROPEnational forest inventoriesproductivityspecies richnesssynthesisTreeDivNettree growth

Identifiers

PMID31641470
PMCPMC6802375

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.