Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31641331›Full record

ReviewHippokratia

C6 cell line: the gold standard in glioma research.

D Giakoumettis, A Kritis, N Foroglou

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Hippokratia. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 69 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
69citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

69 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. The first endovascular rat glioma model for pre-clinical evaluation of intra-arterial therapeutics.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

9 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

D GiakoumettisFirst Department of Neurosurgery, University of Athens Medical School, "Evangelismos" General Hospital, Athens.
A KritisLaboratory of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, School of Health Sciences.
N ForoglouFirst Department of Neurosurgery, AHEPA University Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGlioblastoma multiforme is the most aggressive brain tumor with poor prognosis and an average survival of 1-2 years. Animal models that simulate the features of human glioma are the key to newer agents or therapeutic strategies. In order to establish such models, the C6 glioma cell line has been mostly used in neuro-oncology research.

methodsIn this narrative review, we systematically reviewed the international literature in order to retrieve and present the most important biological and molecular features of C6 cell line.

resultsEven though many cell lines have been developed, each cell line presents with slight differences from human glioma behavior. C6 cancer cell line is a rat glioma cell line, which can simulate in overall the high growth rate, the high vascularization, and the highly infiltrative character of glioblastoma multiforme.

conclusionsMost of the C6 glioma research has been focused on testing a wide diversity of agents for their tumoricidal activity. C6 cell line is considered to be a safe and popular glioma model in the literature, providing a good simulation of glioblastoma multiforme. HIPPOKRATIA 2018, 22(3): 105-112.

Indexed as

C6cell lineglioblastoma multiformegliomarat glioma model

Identifiers

PMID31641331
PMCPMC6801124

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.