ArticleScientific reports2019
Pleione: A tool for statistical and multi-objective calibration of Rule-based models.
Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Modeling approaches for probing cross-feeding interactions in the human gut microbiome.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2022Review
- Comparison of rule- and ordinary differential equation-based dynamic model of DARPP-32 signalling network.PeerJ · 2022Article
- Atlas: automatic modeling of regulation of bacterial gene expression and metabolism using rule-based languages.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mathematical models based on Ordinary Differential Equations (ODEs) are frequently used to describe and simulate biological systems. Nevertheless, such models are often difficult to understand. Unlike ODE models, Rule-Based Models (RBMs) utilise formal language to describe reactions as a cumulative number of statements that are easier to understand and correct. They are also gaining popularity because of their conciseness and simulation flexibility. However, RBMs generally lack tools to perform further analysis that requires simulation. This situation arises because exact and approximate simulations are computationally intensive. Translating RBMs into ODEs is commonly used to reduce simulation time, but this technique may be prohibitive due to combinatorial explosion. Here, we present the software called Pleione to calibrate RBMs. Parameter calibration is essential given the incomplete experimental determination of reaction rates and the goal of using models to reproduce experimental data. The software distributes stochastic simulations and calculations and incorporates equivalence tests to determine the fitness of RBMs compared with data. The primary features of Pleione were thoroughly tested on a model of gene regulation in Escherichia coli. Pleione yielded satisfactory results regarding calculation time and error reduction for multiple simulators, models, parameter search strategies, and computing infrastructures.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.