Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31641238›Full record

ArticleHeredity2020

Genome-wide association studies using binned genotypes.

Bingxing An, Xue Gao, Tianpeng Chang, Jiangwei Xia, Xiaoqiao Wang, Jian Miao, Lingyang Xu, Lupei Zhang, Yan Chen, Junya Li and 2 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heredity, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Bingxing An *Institute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China.
Xue Gao *Institute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China.
Tianpeng ChangInstitute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China.
Jiangwei XiaInstitute of Basic Medical Science, Westlake Institute for Advanced Study, Hangzhou, China.
Xiaoqiao WangInstitute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China.
Jian MiaoInstitute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China.
Lingyang XuInstitute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China.
Lupei ZhangInstitute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China.
Yan ChenInstitute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China.
Junya LiInstitute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China.
Shizhong XuDepartment of Botany and Plant Sciences, University of California, Riverside, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6789-6655
Huijiang GaoInstitute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China. gaohuijiang@caas.cn.
Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences · CNUniversity of California, Riverside · USWestlake University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Linear mixed models (LMM) that tests trait association one marker at a time have been the most popular methods for genome-wide association studies. However, this approach has potential pitfalls: over conservativeness after Bonferroni correction, ignorance of linkage disequilibrium (LD) between neighboring markers, and power reduction due to overfitting SNP effects. So, multiple locus models that can simultaneously estimate and test all markers in the genome are more appropriate. Based on the multiple locus models, we proposed a bin model that combines markers into bins based on their LD relationships. A bin is treated as a new synthetic marker and we detect the associations between bins and traits. Since the number of bins can be substantially smaller than the number of markers, a penalized multiple regression method can be adopted by fitting all bins to a single model. We developed an innovative method to bin the neighboring markers and used the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) method. We compared BIN-Lasso with SNP-Lasso and Q + K-LMM in a simulation experiment, and showed that the new method is more powerful with less Type I error than the other two methods. We also applied the bin model to a Chinese Simmental beef cattle population for bone weight association study. The new method identified more significant associations than the classical LMM. The bin model is a new dimension reduction technique that takes advantage of biological information (i.e., LD). The new method will be a significant breakthrough in associative genomics in the big data era.

Indexed as

Models, GeneticAnimalsCattleComputer SimulationGenetic Association StudiesGenomicsGenotypeLinear ModelsLinkage DisequilibriumPolymorphism, Single Nucleotide

Identifiers

PMID31641238
PMCPMC6972794
OpenAlexW2981829655

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.