ArticleBMJ open2019
Mainstreaming of genomic medicine in gastroenterology, present and future: a nationwide survey of UK gastroenterology trainees.
Article in BMJ open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- Inherited Susceptibility to Cancer: Past, Present and Future.Annals of human genetics · 2025Review
- A qualitative study to evaluate the preparedness of community paediatricians for genomic medicine in England - ready for take-off?Journal of community genetics · 2025Article
- Mainstreaming genomics in the National Health Service in England: a survey to understand preparedness and confidence among paediatricians.BMJ paediatrics open · 2025Article
- Addressing uncertainty in hereditary colorectal cancer: the role of a regional expert multidisciplinary team meeting.Familial cancer · 2025Article
- Exploring healthcare personnel's knowledge, barriers, and innovative approaches in personalised oncology medicine: a scoping review.Critical public health · 2025Review
- Genotes - a 'just-in-time' genomics education resource co-designed with clinicians.BMC medical education · 2024Article
- Preparing tomorrow's doctors for the genomics era: A nationwide survey of UK medical students.Future healthcare journal · 2024Article
- Mismatch Repair Screening of Gastrointestinal Cancers: The Impact on Lynch Syndrome Detection and Immunotherapy.Journal of gastrointestinal cancer · 2023Review
- Evaluation of two Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) in genomic variant interpretation for the NHS workforce.BMC medical education · 2023Article
- Competencies of the UK nursing and midwifery workforce to mainstream genomics in the National Health Service: the ongoing gap between perceived importance and confidence in genomics.Frontiers in genetics · 2023Article
- The English National Lynch Syndrome transformation project: an NHS Genomic Medicine Service Alliance (GMSA) programme.BMJ oncology · 2023Article
- Mainstreaming of genomics in oncology: a nationwide survey of the genomics training needs of UK oncologists.Clinical medicine (London, England) · 2023Article
- GeNotes: a new online 'just in time' genomics resource for healthcare professionals.Future healthcare journal · 2022Article
- Postgraduate training in Cancer Genetics-a cross-specialty survey exploring experience of clinicians in Ireland.Irish journal of medical science · 2022Article
- Patients' and professionals' views related to ethical issues in precision medicine: a mixed research synthesis.BMC medical ethics · 2021Review
- Measuring physician practice, preparedness and preferences for genomic medicine: a national survey.BMJ open · 2021Article
- Ensuring best practice in genomics education and evaluation: reporting item standards for education and its evaluation in genomics (RISE2 Genomics).Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveGenomics and personalised medicine are increasingly relevant for patients with gastroenterological conditions. We aim to capture the current state of genomics training in gastroenterology to review current understanding, clinical experience and long-term educational needs of UK trainees. DESIGN AND
settingA web-based nationwide survey of all UK gastroenterology specialty trainees was conducted in 2017.
results100 trainees (14% of UK gastroenterology trainees) completed this survey. Only 9% and 16% of respondents believe that their local training programme adequately prepares them for the future clinical practice using genomic medicine and personalised medicine, respectively. Barriers identified include the need for greater trainee education (95%), inadequate clinical guidance to base interventions on the results of genomic testing (53%), concerns over misinterpretation by patients (43%) and overuse/misuse of testing by clinicians (34%).Survey respondents felt prepared to perform HFE genotyping (98%), assess TPMT status (97%) and interpret HLA subtyping for suspected coeliac disease (85%). However, only a minority felt prepared to perform the following investigations: polyposis screening (34%), hereditary pancreatitis screening (30%), testing for Lynch yndrome (33%) and KRAS testing for colorectal cancer (20%).Most respondents would support holding dedicated training days on genomic medicine (83%), formal training provisions for the mainstreaming of genomic testing (64%), an update to the UK gastroenterology specialty training curriculum and examinations (57%) and better-defined referral pathways for local genomic services (91%).
conclusionMost gastroenterology trainees in this survey feel ill equipped to practise genomic and personalised medicine as consultants. We propose specific revisions to the UK gastroenterology specialty curriculum that addresses trainees needs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.