Trial reportBMJ open2019
Process evaluation and exploration of telehealth in motor neuron disease in a UK specialist centre.
Trial report in BMJ open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07132879 (Telehealth in MND-Research), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Telehealth in MND-Research (TIM-R): A Research Database for MND
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.
- Advantages and Challenges of Using Telehealth for Home-Based Palliative Care: Systematic Mixed Studies Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2023Pooled it
- Trial
- Evidence-based care pathways for people with dementia and neurodegenerative disorders in Europe: a systematic review of models, integration of digital technologies, and quality indicators.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
- Telehealth and people with disabilities in the United Kingdom: a scoping review.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Development and Evaluation of the Telehealth in Motor Neuron Disease System: The TIME Study Protocol.JMIR research protocols · 2024Article
- Delivery of noninvasive ventilation to people living with motor neuron disease in the UK.ERJ open research · 2023Article
- Using Telemedicine to Monitor the Patient with Chronic Respiratory Failure.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- A Road Map for Remote Digital Health Technology for Motor Neuron Disease.Journal of medical Internet research · 2021Article
- New technologies and Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis - Which step forward rushed by the COVID-19 pandemic?Journal of the neurological sciences · 2020Review
- COVID-19: Launching Neurosurgery into the Era of Telehealth in the United States.World neurosurgery · 2020Review
- Telemedicine as the New Outpatient Clinic Gone Digital: Position Paper From the Pandemic Health System REsilience PROGRAM (REPROGRAM) International Consortium (Part 2).Frontiers in public health · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesTo evaluate the processes involved in using a novel digitally enabled healthcare system (telehealth in motor neuron disease (TiM)) in people living with motor neuron disease (MND) and their informal carers. We examined TiM implementation, potential mechanisms of impact and contextual factors that might influence TiM implementation or impact.
designAn 18-month, single-centre process evaluation within a randomised, pilot and feasibility study.
interventionTiM plus usual care versus usual care alone.
settingA specialist UK MND care centre.
participants40 patients with MND and 37 primary informal carers. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Patient, carer and staff outcomes and experiences using semistructured interviews. Descriptive data on implementation and use of TiM.
resultsThe TiM was acceptable and accessible to patients, carers and staff. Intervention uptake and adherence were good: 14 (70%) patients completed a TiM session at least fortnightly. Barriers to TiM use (such as technology experience and disability) were overcome with well-designed technology and face-to-face training. Reported potential benefits of TiM included improved communication and care coordination, reassurance, identification of complications and the potential for TiM to be an alternative or addition to clinic. Benefits depended on patients' current level of needs or disability. The main challenges were the large number of alerts that were generated by TiM, how the clinicians responded to these alerts and the mismatch between patient/carer expectations and nurses actions. This could be improved by better communication systems and adjusting the alerts algorithm.
conclusionTiM has the potential to facilitate access to specialist care, but further iterative developments to the intervention and process evaluations of the TiM in different services are required. TRIAL IDENTIFIER NUMBER: ISRCTN26675465.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.