Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31640836›Full record

ArticlePrimary health care research & development2019

Implementing dementia risk reduction in primary care: a preliminary conceptual model based on a scoping review of practitioners' views.

Kali Godbee, Jane Gunn, Nicola T Lautenschlager, Eleanor Curran, Victoria J Palmer

Open access · goldAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Primary health care research & development, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. A Qualitative Study of National Perspectives on Advancing Social Prescribing Using Co-Design in Canada.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kali GodbeeDepartment of General Practice, Melbourne Medical School, University of Melbourne, Carlton, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-9090-7479
Jane GunnDepartment of General Practice, Melbourne Medical School, University of Melbourne, Carlton, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8836-7525
Nicola T LautenschlagerAcademic Unit for Psychiatry of Old Age, Department of Psychiatry, Melbourne Medical School, University of Melbourne, Carlton, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4850-7794
Eleanor CurranAcademic Unit for Psychiatry of Old Age, Department of Psychiatry, Melbourne Medical School, University of Melbourne, Carlton, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-9072-068X
Victoria J PalmerDepartment of General Practice, Melbourne Medical School, University of Melbourne, Carlton, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-7212-932X
The University of Melbourne · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Primary care practitioners (PCPs) do not routinely promote dementia risk reduction. The purpose of this study was to map the published literature on the views of PCPs about dementia risk reduction, in order to identify implementation constructs and strategies crucial to the development of an implementation intervention to support dementia risk reduction in primary care. We undertook a scoping review of the PCPs' views about promoting brain health for reducing dementia risk. We searched MEDLINE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, and Embase for English-language articles published between 1995 and December 2017. We then applied the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) and matched Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change to the scoping review findings in order to develop a preliminary implementation model. Eight articles reported views of PCPs about dementia prevention. Study findings were mapped to 5 of the 39 CFIR constructs: (i) knowledge and beliefs about dementia risk reduction, (ii) evidence strength and quality, (iii) relative priority, (iv) available resources, and (v) external policy and incentives. The findings suggest implementation strategies to consider in our preliminary model include (i) educational meetings, (ii) identifying and preparing champions, (iii) conducting local consensus discussions, (iv) altering incentive structures, and (v) capturing and sharing local knowledge. There have been few studies about the views of PCPs about dementia risk reduction. Implementation in the primary care setting is fundamental to early identification of risk and supporting preventive practices, but it needs to focus on more than just education for PCPs. We need more up-to-date and in-depth data on the views of PCPs about dementia risk reduction and context-specific analyses of implementation needs. Further research into effective primary care interventions to reduce dementia risk is expected to support implementation efforts.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticePrimary Health CareRisk Reduction BehaviorDementiaHumansdementia risk reductionimplementation frameworksprimary careprimary preventionscoping review

Identifiers

PMID31640836
PMCPMC6842648
OpenAlexW2982054841

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.