Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31640781›Full record

ArticleClinical epigenetics2019

Random forest-based modelling to detect biomarkers for prostate cancer progression.

Reka Toth, Heiko Schiffmann, Claudia Hube-Magg, Franziska Büscheck, Doris Höflmayer, Sören Weidemann, Patrick Lebok, Christoph Fraune, Sarah Minner, Thorsten Schlomm and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical epigenetics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 75 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
75citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

75 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. High sensitivity to ocean acidification in wild out-migrating juvenile Pacific salmon is not impacted by feeding success.Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Identification ofAnnals of medicine · 2024
    Article
  20. Article

15 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Reka TothCancer Epigenomics, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Heiko SchiffmannDepartment of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.
Claudia Hube-MaggDepartment of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.
Franziska BüscheckDepartment of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.
Doris HöflmayerDepartment of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.
Sören WeidemannDepartment of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.
Patrick LebokDepartment of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.
Christoph FrauneDepartment of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.
Sarah MinnerDepartment of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.
Thorsten SchlommDepartment of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.
Guido SauterDepartment of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.
Christoph PlassCancer Epigenomics, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Yassen AssenovCancer Epigenomics, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Ronald SimonDepartment of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.
Jan MeinersGeneral, Visceral and Thoracic Surgery Department and Clinic, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.
Clarissa GerhäuserCancer Epigenomics, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120, Heidelberg, Germany. c.gerhauser@dkfz.de.ORCID 0000-0002-5792-3901

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe clinical course of prostate cancer (PCa) is highly variable, demanding an individualized approach to therapy. Overtreatment of indolent PCa cases, which likely do not progress to aggressive stages, may be associated with severe side effects and considerable costs. These could be avoided by utilizing robust prognostic markers to guide treatment decisions.

resultsWe present a random forest-based classification model to predict aggressive behaviour of prostate cancer. DNA methylation changes between PCa cases with good or poor prognosis (discovery cohort with n = 70) were used as input. DNA was extracted from formalin-fixed tumour tissue, and genome-wide DNA methylation differences between both groups were assessed using Illumina HumanMethylation450 arrays. For the random forest-based modelling, the discovery cohort was randomly split into a training (80%) and a test set (20%). Our methylation-based classifier demonstrated excellent performance in discriminating prognosis subgroups in the test set (Kaplan-Meier survival analyses with log-rank p value < 0.0001). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for the sensitivity analysis was 95%. Using the ICGC cohort of early- and late-onset prostate cancer (n = 222) and the TCGA PRAD cohort (n = 477) for external validation, AUCs for sensitivity analyses were 77.1% and 68.7%, respectively. Cancer progression-related DNA hypomethylation was frequently located in 'partially methylated domains' (PMDs)-large-scale genomic areas with progressive loss of DNA methylation linked to mitotic cell division. We selected several candidate genes with differential methylation in gene promoter regions for additional validation at the protein expression level by immunohistochemistry in > 12,000 tissue micro-arrayed PCa cases. Loss of ZIC2 protein expression was associated with poor prognosis and correlated with significantly shorter time to biochemical recurrence. The prognostic value of ZIC2 proved to be independent from established clinicopathological variables including Gleason grade, tumour stage, nodal stage and prostate-specific-antigen.

conclusionsOur results highlight the prognostic relevance of methylation loss in PMD regions, as well as of several candidate genes not previously associated with PCa progression. Our robust and externally validated PCa classification model either directly or via protein expression analyses of the identified top-ranked candidate genes will support the clinical management of prostate cancer.

Indexed as

DNA MethylationAgedBiomarkers, TumorDisease ProgressionDown-RegulationEpigenomicsGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansMaleMiddle AgedModels, TheoreticalNeoplasm GradingNuclear ProteinsPrecision MedicinePrognosisBiomarkers, TumorNuclear ProteinsTranscription FactorsZIC2 protein, human

Identifiers

PMID31640781
PMCPMC6805338

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.