Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31640695›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2019

Learning, understanding and the use of information technology: a survey study among primary care physician trainees.

Michel Wensing, Barbara Paech, Catharina Roth, Simon Schwill

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Michel WensingDepartment of General Practice and Health Services Research, Heidelberg University Hospital, Marsilius Arcades, West Tower, Im Neuenheimer Feld 130, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany. Michel.wensing@med.uni-heidelberg.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6569-8137
Barbara PaechHeidelberg University, Institute for Computer Science, Im Neuenheimer Feld 205, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Catharina RothDepartment of General Practice and Health Services Research, Heidelberg University Hospital, Marsilius Arcades, West Tower, Im Neuenheimer Feld 130, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Simon SchwillDepartment of General Practice and Health Services Research, Heidelberg University Hospital, Marsilius Arcades, West Tower, Im Neuenheimer Feld 130, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.

Funding

Marsilius Kolleg, Centre for Advanced Study at Heidelberg University 0
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUser understanding of information technology systems (IT-Systems) is a prerequisite for their use. This study aimed to explore how primary care physician trainees learn, understand and use IT-Systems.

methodsA paper-based survey study among 301 primary care physician trainees in Baden-Wuerttemberg, Germany, was performed. The questionnaire included measures of understanding and use of nine specific system features, five possible learning strategies, a validated scale for affinity for technology interaction, and five individual and three practice characteristics.

resultsThe sample comprised 94 respondents (31.6% response rate). Between 3.2 and 59.6% said to know specific systems features well; between 13.8 and 42.6% expressed a wish to know more about specific system features. The predominant strategy for learning system features was explanation by others: 51.7 to 66.7% had applied this strategy to learn the features. Between 18.6 and 41.4% had learned the features by trial and error. A better understanding of system features was associated with the use of a trial and error strategy for learning system features (beta = 0.260, p = 0.012). The use of a greater variety of learning strategies was associated with higher affinity for technology interaction (beta = 0.215, p = 0.037).

conclusionThe study suggests that many physicians need a better understanding of IT-Systems. The role of manuals, online resources and courses in learning IT-Systems seems limited. The new generation of primary care physicians seem to learn features of IT-Systems through explanation by others and trying in their ambulatory practices. The relevance of IT-Systems in healthcare is high, but physicians need more support in learning to use system features.

Indexed as

Health Information SystemsBiomedical TechnologyCross-Sectional StudiesHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansLearningPhysicians, Primary CareTraining SupportUser-Computer InterfaceInformation technologyPhysician behaviourPrimary care

Identifiers

PMID31640695
PMCPMC6805569

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.