Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31640691›Full record

ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2019

An integrated model to evaluate the impact of social support on improving self-management of type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Xiaojia Wang, Linglan He, Keyu Zhu, Shanshan Zhang, Ling Xin, Weiqun Xu, Yuxiang Guan

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07726589 (The Relationship Between Psychological Well-being, Social Support, and Disease Self-management in Patients With Diabetic Nephropathy), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07726589 not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

The Relationship Between Psychological Well-being, Social Support, and Disease Self-management in Patients With Diabetic Nephropathy

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorNational Taiwan University HospitalRan2026 to 2028Enrolled161ConditionsDiabetic Kidney Disease (DKD), Type 2 Diabetes
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. On Psychology and Psychiatry in Diabetes.Indian journal of endocrinology and metabolism
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Xiaojia WangDepartment of Information Management, School of Management, Hefei University of Technology, Mailbox 270, No. 193, Tunxi Road, Hefei, 230009, An Hui Province, China. xjwang@hfut.edu.cn.ORCID 0000-0001-5294-1599
Linglan HeDepartment of Information Management, School of Management, Hefei University of Technology, Mailbox 270, No. 193, Tunxi Road, Hefei, 230009, An Hui Province, China.
Keyu ZhuDepartment of Information Management, School of Management, Hefei University of Technology, Mailbox 270, No. 193, Tunxi Road, Hefei, 230009, An Hui Province, China.
Shanshan ZhangDepartment of Clinical Teaching, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui University of Chinese Medicine, Hefei, 230031, Anhui, China.
Ling XinThe National Chinese Medicine Clinical Research Base- Key Disease of Diabetes Mellitus Study, Hefei, 230031, Anhui, China.
Weiqun XuThe National Chinese Medicine Clinical Research Base- Key Disease of Diabetes Mellitus Study, Hefei, 230031, Anhui, China.
Yuxiang GuanThe National Chinese Medicine Clinical Research Base- Key Disease of Diabetes Mellitus Study, Hefei, 230031, Anhui, China.
Anhui University of Traditional Chinese Medicine · CNHefei University of Technology · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundType 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) is a chronic disease closely related to personal life style. Therefore, achieving effective self-management is one of the most important ways to control it. There is evidence that social support can help to improve the self-management ability of patients with T2DM, but which social support is more effective has been rarely explored. The purpose of this study is to construct an integrated model to analyze which social support has more significant impact on self-management of T2DM, and provide reasonable suggestions to health care providers on how to effectively play the role of social support.

methodsWe established a social support indicator evaluation system and proposed an integrated model that combines ANP (Analytical Network Process) and CRITIC (CRiteria Importance through Intercriteria Correlation) methods to evaluate the impact of social support on T2DM self-management from both subjective and objective perspectives. The weights calculated by the model will serve as the basis for us to judge the importance of different social support indicators.

resultsInformational support (weighting 49.26%) is the most important criteria, followed by tangible support (weighting 39.24%) and emotional support (weighting 11.51%). Among 11 sub-criteria, guidance (weighting 23.05%) and feedback (weighting 14.68%) are two most relevant with T2DM self-management. This result provides ideas and evidence for health care providers on how to offer more effective social support.

conclusionTo our knowledge, this is the first study in which Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) tools, specifically ANP and CRITIC, are used to evaluate the impact of social support on improving self-management of type 2 diabetes. The study suggests that incorporating two sub-indicators of guidance and feedback into the diabetes care programs may have great potential to improve T2DM self-management and further control patient blood glucose and reduce complications.

Indexed as

Self-ManagementSocial SupportAdultDecision Support TechniquesDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2FemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSelf CareANPCRITICEvaluation indicator systemSelf-managementSocial supportType 2 diabetes

Identifiers

PMID31640691
PMCPMC6805520
OpenAlexW2981803775

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.