Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31640667›Full record

ArticleBMC ecology2019

Environmental variation mediates the prevalence and co-occurrence of parasites in the common lizard, Zootoca vivipara.

Qiang Wu, Murielle Richard, Alexis Rutschmann, Donald B Miles, Jean Clobert

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC ecology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Population Structure and Climate Effects onAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Infestation of Oriental House Rat (International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 3 countries.

Qiang WuCNRS, Station d'Ecologie Théorique et Expérimentale, UMR 5321 and Université Toulouse III-Paul Sabatier, 09200, Moulis, France.ORCID 0000-0002-3005-4072
Murielle RichardCNRS, Station d'Ecologie Théorique et Expérimentale, UMR 5321 and Université Toulouse III-Paul Sabatier, 09200, Moulis, France. murielle.richard@sete.cnrs.fr.
Alexis RutschmannCNRS, Station d'Ecologie Théorique et Expérimentale, UMR 5321 and Université Toulouse III-Paul Sabatier, 09200, Moulis, France.
Donald B MilesCNRS, Station d'Ecologie Théorique et Expérimentale, UMR 5321 and Université Toulouse III-Paul Sabatier, 09200, Moulis, France.
Jean ClobertCNRS, Station d'Ecologie Théorique et Expérimentale, UMR 5321 and Université Toulouse III-Paul Sabatier, 09200, Moulis, France.
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHosts and their parasites are under reciprocal selection, leading to coevolution. However, parasites depend not only on a host, but also on the host's environment. In addition, a single host species is rarely infested by a single species of parasite and often supports multiple species (i.e., multi-infestation). Although the arms race between a parasite and its host has been well studied, few data are available on how environmental conditions may influence the process leading to multiple infestations. In this study, we examine whether: (1) environmental factors including altitude, temperature, vegetation cover, human disturbance, and grazing by livestock affect the prevalence of two types of ectoparasites, mites and ticks, on their host (the common lizard, Zootoca vivipara) and (2) competition is evident between mites and ticks.

resultsWe found the probability of mite infestation increased with altitude and vegetation cover, but decreased with human disturbance and presence of livestock. In contrast, the probability of tick infestation was inversely associated with the same factors. Individuals with low body condition and males had higher mite loads. However, this pattern was not evident for tick loads. The results from a structural equation model revealed that mites and ticks indirectly and negatively affected each other's infestation probability through an interaction involving the environmental context. We detected a direct negative association between mites and ticks only when considering estimates of parasite load. This suggests that both mites and ticks could attach to the same host, but once they start to accumulate, only one of them takes advantage.

conclusionThe environment of hosts has a strong effect on infestation probabilities and parasite loads of mites and ticks. Autecological differences between mites and ticks, as indicated by their opposing patterns along environmental gradients, may explain the pattern of weak contemporary interspecific competition. Our findings emphasize the importance of including environmental factors and the natural history of each parasite species in studies of host-parasite coevolution.

Indexed as

LizardsMite InfestationsMitesParasitesAnimalsHost-Parasite InteractionsMalePrevalenceCommon lizardCompetitionCo-occurrenceEnvironmental mediationParasites

Identifiers

PMID31640667
PMCPMC6806499
OpenAlexW2981733802

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.