Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31640605›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2019

A hospital-based birth defects surveillance system in Kampala, Uganda.

Daniel Mumpe-Mwanja, Linda Barlow-Mosha, Dhelia Williamson, Diana Valencia, Robert Serunjogi, Ayoub Kakande, Joyce Namale-Matovu, Jolly Nankunda, Doreen Birabwa-Male, Margaret Achom Okwero and 2 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Daniel Mumpe-MwanjaMakerere University - Johns Hopkins University Research Collaboration, Kampala, Uganda. dmwanjamumpe@mujhu.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5670-5371
Linda Barlow-MoshaMakerere University - Johns Hopkins University Research Collaboration, Kampala, Uganda.
Dhelia WilliamsonUS Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta, USA.
Diana ValenciaUS Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta, USA.
Robert SerunjogiMakerere University - Johns Hopkins University Research Collaboration, Kampala, Uganda.
Ayoub KakandeMedical Research Council/Uganda Virus Research Institute and London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine Uganda Research Unit, Entebbe, Uganda.
Joyce Namale-MatovuMakerere University - Johns Hopkins University Research Collaboration, Kampala, Uganda.
Jolly NankundaMakerere University College of Health Sciences, Kampala, Uganda.
Doreen Birabwa-MaleMakerere University College of Health Sciences, Kampala, Uganda.
Margaret Achom OkweroUS Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Kampala, Uganda.
Jesca Nsungwa-SabiitiCommunity Health Department, Ministry of Health, Kampala, Uganda.
Philippa MusokeMakerere University - Johns Hopkins University Research Collaboration, Kampala, Uganda.

Funding

CDC HHS 1U10GH000487, 5U01GH000487 and 5U01GH002171-02CGH CDC HHS U01 GH000487CGH CDC HHS U01 GH002171
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn 2010, the World Health Assembly passed a resolution calling upon countries to prevent birth defects where possible. Though birth defects surveillance programs are an important source of information to guide implementation and evaluation of preventive interventions, many countries that shoulder the largest burden of birth defects do not have surveillance programs. This paper shares the results of a hospital-based birth defects surveillance program in Uganda which, can be adopted by similar resource-limited countries.

methodsAll informative births, including live births, stillbirths and spontaneous abortions; regardless of gestational age, delivered at four selected hospitals in Kampala from August 2015 to December 2017 were examined for birth defects. Demographic data were obtained by midwives through maternal interviews and review of hospital patient notes and entered in an electronic data collection tool. Identified birth defects were confirmed through bedside examination by a physician and review of photographs and a narrative description by a birth defects expert. Informative births (live, still and spontaneous abortions) with a confirmed birth defect were included in the numerator, while the total informative births (live, still and spontaneous abortions) were included in the denominator to estimate the prevalence of birth defects per 10,000 births.

resultsThe overall prevalence of birth defects was 66.2/10,000 births (95% CI 60.5-72.5). The most prevalent birth defects (per 10,000 births) were: Hypospadias, 23.4/10,000 (95% CI 18.9-28.9); Talipes equinovarus, 14.0/10,000 (95% CI 11.5-17.1) and Neural tube defects, 10.3/10,000 (95% CI 8.2-13.0). The least prevalent were: Microcephaly, 1.6/10,000 (95% CI 0.9-2.8); Microtia and Anotia, 1.6/10,000 (95% CI 0.9-2.8) and Imperforate anus, 2.0/10,000 (95% CI 1.2-3.4).

conclusionA hospital-based surveillance project with active case ascertainment can generate reliable epidemiologic data about birth defects prevalence and can inform prevention policies and service provision needs in low and middle-income countries.

Indexed as

AdultCongenital AbnormalitiesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHospital RecordsHospitalsHumansIncidenceInfant, NewbornMalePopulation SurveillancePregnancyPrevalenceRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentUgandaBirth defectsBirth prevalenceCongenital anomaliesHospital-based surveillanceUganda

Identifiers

PMID31640605
PMCPMC6805492

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.