Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31640595›Full record

ArticleBMC geriatrics2019

"What would you like to achieve?" Goal-Setting in Patients with Dementia in Geriatric Rehabilitation.

Ilona Dutzi, Michael Schwenk, Marietta Kirchner, Jürgen M Bauer, Klaus Hauer

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC geriatrics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Cognitive Reablement Using Digital Voice Assistants for People Living With Dementia or Mild Cognitive Impairment: A Co-Design Study.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. [Diagnosis and treatment of vascular dementia].Zeitschrift fur Gerontologie und Geriatrie · 2020
    Article
  16. Human Functioning: Developments and Grand Challenges.Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ilona DutziDepartment of Geriatric Research, AGAPLESION Bethanien Hospital, Geriatric Center at the University of Heidelberg, Rohrbacher Str. 149, 69126, Heidelberg, Germany. idutzi@bethanien-heidelberg.de.ORCID 0000-0001-5898-9809
Michael SchwenkNetwork Aging Research, University of Heidelberg, Bergheimer St. 20, 69115, Heidelberg, Germany.
Marietta KirchnerInstitute of Medical Biometry and Informatics, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 130.3, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Jürgen M BauerDepartment of Geriatric Research, AGAPLESION Bethanien Hospital, Geriatric Center at the University of Heidelberg, Rohrbacher Str. 149, 69126, Heidelberg, Germany.
Klaus HauerDepartment of Geriatric Research, AGAPLESION Bethanien Hospital, Geriatric Center at the University of Heidelberg, Rohrbacher Str. 149, 69126, Heidelberg, Germany.
Heidelberg University · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSetting meaningful, individualized rehabilitation goals is an essential part of the rehabilitation process. Even though patients with dementia are a drastically increasing patient group in geriatric rehabilitation, empirical data about meaningful rehabilitation goals and collaborative goal-setting in this target group is missing. Cognitive impairment and lack of insight in current deficits have been discussed as barriers for participation in goal-setting, but require empirical examination. This study investigated the feasibility of a semi-structured versus a structured goal-setting approach and the types of goals, rehabilitation patients with mild to moderate dementia perceive as personally relevant. Insights in acute functional and motor deficits, differentiated by cognitive status were explored.

methodsCohort study in a geriatric rehabilitation center. Semi-structured and ICF-based, structured interviews were applied to explore patients` rehabilitation goals. Patients` insight in deficits was operationalized as the relationship of self-ratings and objective measures of linked clinical assessments for the same functional construct.

resultsPatients (n = 101, MMSE 22 ± 2.6, age 83.9 ± 5.9 years) stated the improvement of mobility-related functions and self-care activities (> 70%) but also psychological well-being such as handling stress or mood (> 38%) as most important rehabilitation goals. The structured interview facilitated goal-setting and provided a broader view of rehabilitation needs. Correlations between self-ratings and clinical assessments were medium to high (rho = 0.29 to 0.83) with highest associations for key motor features. Trend tests identified a significant trend between values of the clinical assessment and categories of self-ratings (p ≤ 0.01) with lower cognitive status derogating this relationship.

conclusionsCollaborative goal-setting was feasible, especially when supported by a structured approach and yielded a large spectrum of functional but also psychological rehabilitation needs from the patients` perspective. Patients showed sustained insight in their actual functional impairments, limited in a subgroup of patients with more advanced cognitive impairment.

Indexed as

GoalsHealth Services for the AgedRehabilitation CentersAgedAged, 80 and overCohort StudiesDementiaFemaleHumansMaleProspective StudiesSelf CareSocial BehaviorDementiaGeriatricsGoal-settingICFRehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID31640595
PMCPMC6805571
OpenAlexW2981621457

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.