Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31640520›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2019

Meiotic drive mechanisms: lessons from

Cécile Courret, Ching-Ho Chang, Kevin H-C Wei, Catherine Montchamp-Moreau, Amanda M Larracuente

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 75 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
75citing papers in PubMed
16.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

75 citing papers in PubMed, 128 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The evolutionary genomics of meiotic drive.Molecular biology and evolution · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The metabolic costs of meiotic drive.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Killer meiotic drive executed by two alternative conformations of a single protein.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article

15 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Cécile CourretEvolution Génome Comportement et Ecologie, CNRS, IRD, Université Paris-Sud, Université Paris-Saclay, Gif sur Yvette 91190, France.
Ching-Ho ChangDepartment of Biology, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA.
Kevin H-C WeiDepartment of Integrative Biology, University of California, Berkley, CA, USA.
Catherine Montchamp-MoreauEvolution Génome Comportement et Ecologie, CNRS, IRD, Université Paris-Sud, Université Paris-Saclay, Gif sur Yvette 91190, France.
Amanda M LarracuenteDepartment of Biology, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA.
Université Paris-Sud · FRUniversity of Rochester · US

Funding

The evolutionary and functional genomics of satellite DNAR35GM119515 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI Amanda Marie Larracuente · 2016 to 2026
$4.0M
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM119515
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Meiotic drivers are selfish genetic elements that bias their transmission into gametes, often to the detriment of the rest of the genome. The resulting intragenomic conflicts triggered by meiotic drive create evolutionary arms races and shape genome evolution. The phenomenon of meiotic drive is widespread across taxa but is particularly prominent in the

Indexed as

AnimalsDrosophilaMeiosisRepetitive Sequences, Nucleic AcidSelection, GeneticDrosophilagenetic conflictheterochromatinmeiotic drive

Identifiers

PMID31640520
PMCPMC6834043
OpenAlexW2982055372

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.