Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31640515›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2019

Genetic coupling of signal and preference facilitates sexual isolation during rapid speciation.

Mingzi Xu, Kerry L Shaw

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Genetic Coupling of Mate Recognition Systems in the Genomic Era.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2024
    Review
  11. Genetics and the Evolution of Prezygotic Isolation.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2024
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Mingzi XuDepartment of Neurobiology and Behavior, Cornell University, 215 Tower Rd, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA.
Kerry L ShawDepartment of Neurobiology and Behavior, Cornell University, 215 Tower Rd, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The divergence of sexual signals is ultimately a coevolutionary process: while signals and preferences diverge between lineages, they must remain coordinated within lineages for matings to occur. Divergence in sexual signals makes a major contribution to evolving species barriers. Therefore, the genetic architecture underlying signal-preference coevolution is essential to understanding speciation but remains largely unknown. In

Indexed as

Sexual Behavior, AnimalAnimalsChromosome MappingFemaleGenetic LinkageGryllidaeLinkage DisequilibriumMaleMating Preference, Animalbehavioural barriergenetic architectureLaupalamating preferencepleiotropyreproductive isolation

Identifiers

PMID31640515
PMCPMC6834049

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.