ArticleNutrients2019
Reproducibility and Relative Validity of the Healthy Eating Index-2015 and Nutrient-Rich Food Index 9.3 Estimated by Comprehensive and Brief Diet History Questionnaires in Japanese Adults.
Article in Nutrients, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
28 citing papers in PubMed.
- Associations of food security and food assistance with cardiovascular morbidity and mortality among postmenopausal women from the women's health initiative.Journal of epidemiology and community health · 2026Article
- Application of a Food-Based Nutritional Profiling System to Assess Diet Quality in Diet-Level Data: Evidence on Construct and Convergent Validity from the Hatoyama Cohort Study and Kusatsu Cohort Study.Current developments in nutrition · 2026Article
- Reproducibility and validity of healthy dietary indices derived from 24-hour dietary recalls.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
- Associations of diet quality indices with all-cause and cause-specific mortality among Japanese adults in the Takayama study.The British journal of nutrition · 2025Article
- Relationship of dietary intake and eating behaviors with glycemic control and body weight under long-term treatment with dapagliflozin: an exploratory prospective study.Diabetology international · 2025Article
- Associations between diet quality scores and cardiometabolic status in young Japanese women: A cross-sectional study.Asia Pacific journal of clinical nutrition · 2025Article
- High dietary acid load increases the risk of disability in women aged 75 years and older: A community-based cohort study.The Journal of frailty & aging · 2025Article
- Possible determinants of physical fitness in Japanese school children: A cross-sectional study.Paediatric and perinatal epidemiology · 2025Article
- Relative validity of three diet quality scores derived from the Brief-type Self-administered Diet History Questionnaire and Meal-based Diet History Questionnaire in Japanese adults.The British journal of nutrition · 2024Article
- Pathways From Socioeconomic Factors to Major Cardiovascular Events Among Postmenopausal Veteran and Nonveteran Women: Findings From the Women's Health Initiative.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2024Article
- Diet and the gut microbiome in patients with Parkinson's disease.NPJ Parkinson's disease · 2024Article
- Associations of food choice values and food literacy with overall diet quality: a nationwide cross-sectional study in Japanese adults.The British journal of nutrition · 2023Article
- Association of the Length of Service of 24/48 Firefighters with the Quality of Their Diet and Selected Anthropometric Parameters.Nutrients · 2023Article
- Relative validity of the online Meal-based Diet History Questionnaire for evaluating the overall diet quality and quality of each meal type in Japanese adults.The British journal of nutrition · 2023Article
- Article
- Food combination questionnaire for Japanese: relative validity regarding food and nutrient intake and overall diet quality against the 4-day weighed dietary record.Journal of nutritional science · 2023Article
- Relative Validity of the Meal-Based Diet History Questionnaire for Estimating Nutrient Intake among Japanese Women and Men aged 30-76 Years.Nutrients · 2022Article
- Article
- Interrelations between Gut Microbiota Composition, Nutrient Intake and Diabetes Status in an Adult Japanese Population.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
- Characterisation of breakfast, lunch, dinner and snacks in the Japanese context: an exploratory cross-sectional analysis.Public health nutrition · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We examined the reproducibility and relative validity of two measures of overall diet quality, the Healthy Eating Index-2015 (HEI-2015) and Nutrient-Rich Food Index 9.3 (NRF9.3), as estimated by well-established self-administered dietary assessment questionnaires for the Japanese, namely the comprehensive diet history questionnaire (DHQ) and the brief diet history questionnaire (BDHQ). Diet was assessed separately by two DHQs and two BDHQs at a 1-year interval and by 16-day weighed dietary records (DRs) in 121 women and 121 men aged 31-81 years. HEI-2015 and NRF9.3 were calculated from each method. The reproducibility correlation for the two questionnaires (intraclass correlation) ranged from 0.53 (HEI-2015 from BDHQ in men) to 0.77 (NRF9.3 from BDHQ in women). The validity correlation between the first questionnaires and DR (Pearson correlation) ranged from 0.37 (NRF9.3 from BDHQ in men) to 0.61 (NRF9.3 from DHQ and BDHQ in women). Bland-Altman plots showed poor agreement between the DHQ or BDHQ and DR, as well as the presence of weak proportional bias. Overall, these data indicate reasonable reproducibility and ranking ability of the DHQ and BDHQ for assessing the HEI-2015 and NRF9.3 and support their usefulness in future epidemiological research on the overall effects of Japanese diets on various health outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.