Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31640111›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2019

Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Comprehensive Smoke-Free Legislation in Indoor Public Places in Shanghai, China.

Yanxia Wei, Ron Borland, Pinpin Zheng, Hua Fu, Fan Wang, Jingyi He, Yitian Feng

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Yanxia WeiDepartment of Preventive Medicine and Health Education, School of Public Health, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China. 17111020015@fudan.edu.cn.
Ron BorlandMelbourne School of Psychological Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne 3010, Australia. rborland@unimelb.edu.au.
Pinpin ZhengDepartment of Preventive Medicine and Health Education, School of Public Health, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China. zpinpin@shmu.edu.cn.
Hua FuDepartment of Preventive Medicine and Health Education, School of Public Health, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China. hfu@fudan.edu.cn.
Fan WangDepartment of Politics, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200241, China. wangfan512@126.com.
Jingyi HeDepartment of Preventive Medicine and Health Education, School of Public Health, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China. 16211020052@fudan.edu.cn.
Yitian FengDepartment of Preventive Medicine and Health Education, School of Public Health, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China. 15211020019@fudan.edu.cn.
Fudan University · CNEast China Normal University · CNUniversity of Melbourne · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study evaluated compliance with the comprehensive smoke-free law in public indoor places introduced in Shanghai in March 2017. Observations and PM2.5 monitoring over 30 min intervals in 8 types of the venue were conducted three times: within a month before implementation and 3- and 12-months post implementation. Observations of evidence of smoking decreased from 66.2% before legislation to 52.8% three months after (

Indexed as

Air PollutantsAir Pollution, IndoorChinaEnvironmental MonitoringGovernment RegulationParticulate MatterRestaurantsTobacco Smoke PollutionToilet FacilitiesAir PollutantsParticulate MatterTobacco Smoke Pollutioncompliancecomprehensive smoke-free lawindoor public placesPM2.5SHS

Identifiers

PMID31640111
PMCPMC6843952
OpenAlexW2981285264

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.