Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31640110›Full record

Trial reportInternational journal of environmental research and public health2019

Two Approaches to Increase Physical Activity for Preschool Children in Child Care Centers: A Matched-Pair Cluster-Randomized Trial.

Pooja S Tandon, Katherine L Downing, Brian E Saelens, Dimitri A Christakis

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Interventions to prevent obesity in children aged 2 to 4 years old.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. The role of playgrounds in promoting children's health - a scoping review.The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Pooja S TandonCenter for Child Health, Behavior, and Development, Seattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, WA 98145, USA. pooja@uw.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-7180-838X
Katherine L DowningInstitute for Physical Activity and Nutrition (IPAN), School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Geelong VIC 3220, Australia. k.downing@deakin.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0002-6552-8506
Brian E SaelensCenter for Child Health, Behavior, and Development, Seattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, WA 98145, USA. Brian.saelens@seattlechildrens.org.
Dimitri A ChristakisCenter for Child Health, Behavior, and Development, Seattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, WA 98145, USA. Dimitri.christakis@seattlechildrens.org.
Seattle Children's Hospital · USDeakin University · AU

Funding

NIH HHS K23 HL112950-01A1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Early childhood education settings are critical for promoting physical activity (PA) but intervention effects are often small. The aim of this study was to develop, test, and compare two approaches to increasing physical activity among preschoolers at child care centers: one focused on a teacher-led PA curriculum (Active Play!) and the other on increasing outdoor child-initiated free play time (Outdoor Play!). We conducted a matched-pair cluster-randomized study in 10 centers in and around Seattle, WA, USA (n = 97 children, mean age 4.6). Pre- and post-intervention data were collected from observations and accelerometers. At pre-intervention, 19% of Active Play! and 25% of Outdoor Play! children achieved >120 min/day of PA during child care. The total opportunity for PA increased in both interventions (Active Play! = 11 min/day; Outdoor Play! = 14 min/day), with the largest increase in outdoor child-initiated free playtime (Active Play! = 19 min/day; Outdoor Play! = 24 min/day). No changes in sedentary time, light or moderate- to vigorous-intensity PA (MVPA) were observed in either intervention and there was no difference between interventions in the percentage of children attaining more than 120 min/day of PA. A small (<3 min/day) relative increase in teacher-led outdoor activity was observed in the Active Play! intervention. Both intervention strategies led to an increase in active play opportunities, predominantly outdoors, but neither was able to substantially increase the intensity and/or duration of children's PA. Future studies are needed to better understand and inform sustainable approaches to increase PA in early learning settings.

Indexed as

Child Day Care CentersExercisePlay and PlaythingsAccelerometryAdolescentAdultChild HealthChild, PreschoolEducational PersonnelFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedYoung Adultactive playchild careoutdoorsphysical activitypreschool

Identifiers

PMID31640110
PMCPMC6843925
OpenAlexW2980718629

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.