Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31639237›Full record

ArticleClinical anatomy (New York, N.Y.)2020

Interactive three-dimensional teaching models of the female and male pelvic floor.

Yi Wu, Jill P J M Hikspoors, Greet Mommen, Noshir F Dabhoiwala, Xin Hu, Li-Wen Tan, Shao-Xiang Zhang, Wouter H Lamers

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical anatomy (New York, N.Y.), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Towards a Terminologia Anatomica Humana.Anatomical science international · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Yi WuTytgat Institute for Liver and Intestinal Research, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Jill P J M HikspoorsDepartment of Anatomy & Embryology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Greet MommenDepartment of Anatomy & Embryology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Noshir F DabhoiwalaTytgat Institute for Liver and Intestinal Research, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Xin HuInstitute of Digital Medicine, College of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Medicine, Army Military Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Li-Wen TanInstitute of Digital Medicine, College of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Medicine, Army Military Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Shao-Xiang ZhangInstitute of Digital Medicine, College of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Medicine, Army Military Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Wouter H LamersTytgat Institute for Liver and Intestinal Research, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Army Medical University · CNMaastricht University · NLAcademic Medical Center · NLUniversity of Amsterdam · NL

Funding

Graduate Education and Teaching Reform Research Project of Chongqing yjg183144John L. Emmett Foundation for Urology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands no numberNational Natural Science Foundation of China 31771324National Natural Science Foundation of China cstc2018jcyjAX0537
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Controversies regarding structure and function of the pelvic floor persist because of its poor accessibility and complex anatomical architecture. Most data are based on dissection. This "surgical" approach requires profound prior knowledge, because applying the scalpel precludes a "second look." The "sectional" approach does not entail these limitations, but requires segmentation of structures and three-dimensional reconstruction. This approach has produced several "Visible Human Projects." We dealt with limited spatial resolution and difficult-to-segment structures by proceeding from clear-cut to more fuzzy boundaries and comparing segmentation between investigators. We observed that the bicipital levator ani muscle consisted of pubovisceral and puborectal portions; that the pubovisceral muscle formed, together with rectococcygeal and rectoperineal muscles, a rectal diaphragm; that the external anal sphincter consisted of its subcutaneous portion and the puborectal muscle only; that the striated urethral sphincter had three parts, of which the middle (urethral compressor) was best developed in females and the circular lower ("membranous") best in males; that the rectourethral muscle, an anterior extension of the rectal longitudinal smooth muscle, developed a fibrous node in its center (perineal body); that the perineal body was much better developed in females than males, so that the rectourethral subdivision into posterior rectoperineal and anterior deep perineal muscles was more obvious in females; that the superficial transverse perineal muscle attached to the fibrous septa of the ischioanal fat; and that the uterosacral ligaments and mesorectal fascia colocalized. To facilitate comprehension of the modified topography we provide interactive 3D-PDFs that are freely available for teaching purposes. Clin. Anat. 33:275-285, 2020. © 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Indexed as

Imaging, Three-DimensionalModels, AnatomicAnatomyFemaleHumansMalePelvic Flooradiposityanal sphincterlevator ani muscleperineal bodyrectourethral musclesexual dimorphismurethral sphinctervaginal support

Identifiers

PMID31639237
PMCPMC7027585
OpenAlexW2981572145

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.