ArticlePloS one2019
Enriched taxa were found among the gut microbiota of centenarians in East China.
Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
40 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.
- Taxonomic and functional remodeling of the gut microbiota during aging and implications for microbiota-derived biomarkers.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2026Review
- Plasma acetic acid mediates the relationship between gut microbiome and various health measures in older adults.Communications medicine · 2026Article
- Article
- Estropausal gut microbiota transplant improves measures of ovarian function in adult mice.Nature aging · 2026Article
- Characteristic of different thermal treatment-induced dough protein oxidation and its impact on human gut microbiota.Current research in food science · 2026Article
- Associations Between the Gut Microbiota and Physical Activity, Sedentary Behaviour and Physical Function in Community-Dwelling Older Adults.Journal of aging research · 2026Article
- Examination of shared gut microbiome signatures in aging and Parkinson's disease.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2026Review
- rCCLasso: a robust framework for microbial correlation network analysis reveals age-related microbial dynamics.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Article
- Dietary Effects, Age, and Urban-Rural Dynamics in Shaping Gut Microbiota of Elderly Vietnamese: A Cross-Sectional Study.Microorganisms · 2025Article
- Preliminary Evaluation of the Gut Microbiota Modulatory Potential of Malaysian Kefir Water in Ageing Mice.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Regulatory and Influencing Factors of Digestive Function in Elderly People: Roles of the Gut Microbiota and Nutritional Interventions.Aging and disease · 2025Review
- The human gut microbiome and sleep across adulthood: associations and therapeutic potential.Letters in applied microbiology · 2025Review
- Factors involved in human healthy aging: insights from longevity individuals.Frontiers of medicine · 2025Review
- Achieving healthy aging through gut microbiota-directed dietary intervention: Focusing on microbial biomarkers and host mechanisms.Journal of advanced research · 2025Review
- Dietary patterns influencing the human colonic microbiota from infancy to centenarian age: a narrative review.Frontiers in nutrition · 2025Review
- Intestinal Microbiota and Aging in People with HIV-What We Know and What We Don't.Current HIV/AIDS reports · 2024Review
- Aging Gut Microbiome in Healthy and Unhealthy Aging.Aging and disease · 2024Review
- Article
- Evidence that the loss of colonic anti-microbial peptides may promote dysbiotic Gram-negative inflammaging-associated bacteria in aging mice.Frontiers in aging · 2024Article
- Changes of faecal bacterial communities and microbial fibrolytic activity in horses aged from 6 to 30 years old.PloS one · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGut microbiota is closely related to age. Studies from Europe and the U.S. identified featured microbiota in different age groups for the elderly. Asian studies mainly focused on people living in longevity areas. Featured microbiota for the elderly people of different age groups, especially in the centenarian in the general population, has not been well investigated in China.
methodWe conducted a comparative study by including 198 subjects of three age groups (65-70, 90-99, and 100+ years) in East China. Information regarding age, sex, height, weight, waist circumference, hip circumference, food preference, smoking status and alcohol consumption were collected by using a structured questionnaire. Fecal samples for each participant were collected as well. 16S rRNA gene sequencing were employed to analyze the gut microbiota composition. Logistic regression with LASSO feature selection was used to identify featured taxa in different age groups and to assess their potential interactions with other factors such as lifestyle.
resultThe gut microbiota of the 90-99 year and 100+ year age groups showed more diversity, robustness, and richness compared with the 65-70 year age group. PCoA analysis showed a clear separation between the 65-70 and 100+ year age groups. At the species level, Bacteroides fragilis, Parabacteroides merdae, Ruminococcus gnavus, Coprococcus and Clostridium perfringens increased, but Bacteroides vulgatus, Ruminococcus sp.5139BFAA and Clostridium sp.AT5 decreased in the 90-99 year age group. The age differences in gut microbiota were similar across the strata of smoking, alcohol consumption status and food preference.
conclusionOur study demonstrated age differences in many aspects of gut microbiota, such as overall diversity, microbiota structure, and relative abundance of key taxa. Moreover, the gut microbiota of centenarian was significantly different from those of younger age groups of the elderly.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.