Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31639068›Full record

ArticleBMC research notes2019

Assessment of cervical cancer services and cervical cancer related knowledge of health service providers in public health facilities in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.

Firdawek Getahun, Adamu Addissie, Shiferaw Negash, Gebrekiros Gebremichael

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC research notes, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Firdawek GetahunDepartment of Public Health, Arbaminch University, Arba Minch, Ethiopia.
Adamu AddissieSchool of Public Health, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Shiferaw NegashDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Gebrekiros GebremichaelDepartment of Public Health, Arbaminch University, Arba Minch, Ethiopia. kirosalma@gmail.com.
Addis Ababa University · ETArba Minch University · ET

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo assess cervical cancer services and knowledge of health service providers in public health facilities.

resultTwo of the three hospitals had cervical cancer screening services. One-third of the hospital had cervical cancer diagnosis service punch biopsy and cervical cancer treatment. Majority, 289 (93.5%) of study participants said cervical cancer was a preventable disease. Having multiple sexual partners 257 (83.2%) and post coital bleeding 251 (81.2%), were the most mentioned risk factor and clinical manifestation of cervical cancer respectively. Majority of the participants were aware of the correct time to start screening 291 (70.5%), and only 95 (25.9%) knew the screening intervals. Overall, 165 (53.4%) of health providers scored below the mean knowledge level score. Females had better knowledge about cervical cancer than males (X

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeAdultClinical CompetenceCross-Sectional StudiesEarly Detection of CancerEthiopiaFemaleHealth PersonnelHumansMaleMiddle AgedPublic HealthRisk FactorsSexual PartnersUterine Cervical NeoplasmsCervical cancer servicesHealth service providersKnowledge

Identifiers

PMID31639068
PMCPMC6805432
OpenAlexW2933025749

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.