Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31639059›Full record

ArticleHuman genomics2019

An embedded method for gene identification problems involving unwanted data heterogeneity.

Meng Lu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human genomics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 52% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Meng LuDepartment of Information Management,Tianjin University, Tianjin, China. lvmeng0502@gmail.com.
Tianjin University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundModern applications such as bioinformatics collecting data in various ways can easily result in heterogeneous data. Traditional variable selection methods assume samples are independent and identically distributed, which however is not suitable for these applications. Some existing statistical models capable of taking care of unwanted variation were developed for gene identification involving heterogeneous data, but they lack model predictability and suffer from variable redundancy.

resultsBy accounting for the unwanted heterogeneity effectively, our method have shown its superiority over several state-of-the art methods, which is validated by the experimental results in both unsupervised and supervised gene identification problems. Moreover, we also applied our method to a pan-cancer study where our method can identify the most discriminative genes best distinguishing different cancer types.

conclusionsThis article provides an alternative gene identification method that can accounting for unwanted data heterogeneity. It is a promising method to provide new insights into the complex cancer biology and clues for understanding tumorigenesis and tumor progression.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsDatabases, GeneticComputational BiologyFemaleGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression RegulationGene OntologyHumansMaleNeoplasmsROC CurveEmbedded variable selectionGene identificationUnwanted heterogeneity

Identifiers

PMID31639059
PMCPMC6805328
OpenAlexW2982143087

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.