Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31638997›Full record

ArticleJournal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance2019

Accelerated aortic 4D flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance using compressed sensing: applicability, validation and clinical integration.

Elisabeth Neuhaus, Kilian Weiss, Rene Bastkowski, Jonas Koopmann, David Maintz, Daniel Giese

Abstract readValidation StudyVideo-Audio Media
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Comparison of Echo-Planar Imaging and Compressed Sensing in the Estimation of Flow Metrics from Aortic 4D Flow MR Imaging: A Healthy Volunteer Study.Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. 4D Flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance consensus statement: 2023 update.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance · 2023
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Assessing the Complicated Venous Hemodynamics and Therapeutic Outcomes of Budd-Chiari Syndrome with Respiratory-gated 4D Flow MR Imaging During the Expiratory and Inspiratory Phases.Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Abdominal applications of quantitative 4D flow MRI.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Elisabeth NeuhausInstitute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany. elisabeth.neuhaus@uk-koeln.de.ORCID 0000-0002-7506-0169
Kilian WeissInstitute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany.
Rene BastkowskiInstitute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany.
Jonas KoopmannInstitute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany.
David MaintzInstitute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany.
Daniel GieseInstitute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThree-dimensional time-resolved phase-contrast cardiovascular magnetic resonance (4D flow CMR) enables the quantification and visualisation of blood flow, but its clinical applicability remains hampered by its long scan time. The aim of this study was to evaluate the use of compressed sensing (CS) with on-line reconstruction to accelerate the acquisition and reconstruction of 4D flow CMR of the thoracic aorta.

methods4D flow CMR of the thoracic aorta was acquired in 20 healthy subjects using CS with acceleration factors ranging from 4 to 10. As a reference, conventional parallel imaging (SENSE) with acceleration factor 2 was used. Flow curves, net flows, peak flows and peak velocities were extracted from six contours along the aorta. To measure internal data consistency, a quantitative particle trace analysis was performed. Additionally, scan-rescan, inter- and intraobserver reproducibility were assessed. Subsequently, 4D flow CMR with CS factor 6 was acquired in 3 patients with differing aortopathies. The flow patterns resulting from particle trace visualisation were qualitatively analysed.

resultsAll collected data were successfully acquired and reconstructed on-line. The average acquisition time including respiratory navigator efficiency with CS factor 6 was 5:02 ± 2:23 min while reconstruction took approximately 9 min. For CS factors of 8 or less, mean differences in net flow, peak flow and peak velocity as compared to SENSE were below 2.2 ± 7.8 ml/cycle, 4.6 ± 25.2 ml/s and - 7.9 ± 13.0 cm/s, respectively. For a CS factor of 10 differences reached 5.4 ± 8.0 ml/cycle, 14.4 ± 28.3 ml/s and - 4.0 ± 12.2 cm/s. Scan-rescan analysis yielded mean differences in net flow of - 0.7 ± 4.9 ml/cycle for SENSE and - 0.2 ± 8.5 ml/cycle for CS factor of 6.

conclusionsA six- to eightfold acceleration of 4D flow CMR using CS is feasible. Up to a CS acceleration rate of 6, no statistically significant differences in measured flow parameters could be observed with respect to the reference technique. Acquisitions in patients with aortopathies confirm the potential to integrate the proposed method in a clinical routine setting, whereby its main benefits are scan-time savings and direct on-line reconstruction.

Indexed as

HemodynamicsMagnetic Resonance AngiographyAdultAorta, ThoracicAortic DiseasesBlood Flow VelocityCase-Control StudiesFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedMaleMiddle AgedPerfusion ImagingPredictive Value of TestsRegional Blood Flow4D flow CMRAortaCompressed sensingPhase-contrast CMRSENSE

Identifiers

PMID31638997
PMCPMC6802342

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.