Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31638680›Full record

Trial reportJAMA2019

Effect of Cryotherapy vs Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure on Cervical Disease Recurrence Among Women With HIV and High-Grade Cervical Lesions in Kenya: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Sharon A Greene, Hugo De Vuyst, Grace C John-Stewart, Barbra A Richardson, Christine J McGrath, Kara G Marson, T Tony Trinh, Nelly Yatich, Catherine Kiptinness, Anthony Cagle and 4 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01298596 (Impact of Cryotherapy Versus Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure), which is not on this map. Cited by 23 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01298596 nacompletednot on this map

Impact of Cryotherapy Versus Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure (LEEP) on Recurrence of Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia and HIV-1 Cervical Shedding Among HIV-positive Women

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of WashingtonRan2011 to 2017Enrolled400ConditionsCervical Intraepithelial NeoplasiaArmsLoop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure (LEEP), Cryotherapy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Safety and adherence to self-administered intravaginal 5-fluorouracil cream following cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 2/3 treatment among HIV-positive women in Kenya: A phase 1 clinical trial.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Mapping the Current and Future Noncommunicable Disease Burden in Kenya by Human Immunodeficiency Virus Status: A Modeling Study.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Sharon A GreeneDepartment of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle.
Hugo De VuystPrevention and Implementation Group, International Agency for Research on Cancer (WHO-IARC), Lyon, France.
Grace C John-StewartDepartment of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle.
Barbra A RichardsonDepartment of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle.
Christine J McGrathDepartment of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle.
Kara G MarsonDepartment of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle.
T Tony TrinhDepartment of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle.
Nelly YatichDepartment of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle.
Catherine KiptinnessDepartment of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle.
Anthony CagleDepartment of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle.
Evans Nyongesa-MalavaDepartment of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle.
Samah R SakrCoptic Hospital, Nairobi, Kenya.
Nelly R MugoDepartment of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle.
Michael H ChungDepartment of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle.
University of Washington · USCentre International de Recherche sur le Cancer · FRKenya Medical Research Institute · KENairobi Hospital · KE

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: The World Health Organization recommends cryotherapy or loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP) for histologically confirmed cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) grade 2 or higher regardless of HIV status. Cryotherapy is more feasible in resource-limited settings but may be less effective for women living with HIV. Objective: To evaluate whether cryotherapy or LEEP is a more effective treatment for high-grade cervical lesions among women with HIV. Design, Setting, and Participants: Single-center randomized trial conducted among women with HIV and CIN grade 2 or 3. From June 2011 to September 2016, women with HIV in Kenya underwent cervical screening with Papanicolaou testing and confirmatory biopsy. The final date on which a study procedure was administered was September 7, 2016. Interventions: Women with HIV infection and CIN grade 2 or 3 were randomized 1:1 to receive cryotherapy (n = 200) or LEEP (n = 200) and were followed up every 6 months for 24 months with a Papanicolaou test and confirmatory biopsy. Main Outcome and Measures: The primary outcome was disease recurrence, defined as CIN grade 2 or higher on cervical biopsy, during the 24-month follow-up period. Results: Among 400 women who were randomized (median age, 37.4 [interquartile range, 31.9-43.8] years), 339 (85%) completed the trial. Over 2 years, 60 women (30%) randomized to cryotherapy had recurrent CIN grade 2 or higher vs 37 (19%) in the LEEP group (relative risk, 1.71 [95% CI, 1.12-2.65]; risk difference, 7.9% [95% CI, 1.9%-14.0%]; P = .01). Adverse events occurred in 40 women (45 events, including change in pathology and death due to other causes) in the cryotherapy group and in 30 women (38 events, including change in pathology and unrelated gynecological complications) in the LEEP group. Conclusions and Relevance: In this single-center study of women with HIV infection and CIN grade 2 or 3, treatment with LEEP compared with cryotherapy resulted in a significantly lower rate of cervical neoplasia recurrence over 24 months. Cost-effectiveness analysis is necessary to determine whether the additional benefit of LEEP represents an efficient use of the additional resources that would be required. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01298596.

Indexed as

CryosurgeryElectrosurgeryAdolescentAdultCD4 Lymphocyte CountColposcopyFemaleHIV InfectionsHumansIncidenceIntention to Treat AnalysisKenyaMiddle AgedNeoplasm GradingNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalProportional Hazards Models

Identifiers

PMID31638680
PMCPMC6806442
OpenAlexW2982116083

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.